Can we distinguish between benign and malignant breast tumors in DCE-MRI by studying a tumor's most suspect region only?

We investigate the task of breast tumor classification based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data (DCE-MRI). Our objective is to study how the formation of regions of similar voxels contributes to distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors. First, we perform clustering on each tumor with different algorithms and parameter settings, and then combine the clustering results to identify the most suspect region of the tumor and derive features from it. With these features we train classifiers on a set of tumors that are difficult to classify, even for human experts. We show that the features of the most suspect region alone cannot distinguish between benign and malignant tumors, yet the properties of this region are indicative of tumor malignancy for the dataset we studied.

[1]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[2]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Circumscribed mass lesions on mammography: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to differentiate malignancy and benignancy. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[3]  Claudio Marrocco,et al.  Detection of cluster of microcalcifications based on watershed segmentation algorithm , 2012, 2012 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS).

[4]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Classification of Benign and Malignant DCE-MRI Breast Tumors by Analyzing the Most Suspect Region , 2013, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[5]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[6]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure , 1999, SIGMOD '99.

[7]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[8]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  A visual analytics approach to diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI data , 2010, Comput. Graph..

[9]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  A lesion shape and margin characterization method in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[10]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  WEKA: a machine learning workbench , 1994, Proceedings of ANZIIS '94 - Australian New Zealnd Intelligent Information Systems Conference.

[11]  Scott Fields,et al.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Density-Connected Subspace Clustering for High-Dimensional Data , 2004, SDM.

[13]  D. Massart,et al.  Looking for natural patterns in data: Part 1. Density-based approach , 2001 .

[14]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  B. Preim,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in breast DCE-MRI--quantification of the heterogeneity of breast lesions. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Aiko M. Hormann,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning. Part I , 1962, Inf. Control..

[17]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[18]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[19]  Antonella Petrillo,et al.  Segmentation and classification of breast lesions using dynamic and textural features in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, 2012 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS).

[20]  Mieczyslaw Gajda,et al.  Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis? , 2009, Academic radiology.