Flood exposure and settlement expansion since pre-industrial times in 1850 until 2011 in north Bavaria, Germany

During the past century, land use change, such as settlement development and intensification of agriculture, has led to a decreased capacity of natural floodplains to provide flood regulation across large areas of Europe. The expansion of built-up areas in flood zones has reduced retention areas, potentially leading to an increase of downstream flood risk and an increased demand for flood regulation measures. The goal of this paper was to analyse the historic development of settlements from the 1850s until 2011 in relation to flood exposure in the upper reaches of the river Main, Germany. The settlement area of pre-industrial times was derived from historical land cover maps with the aid of object-based classification. Current settlement areas were extracted from the real estate map of Bavaria. Topographic and flood exposure variables were utilized for the statistical analysis of settlement change. Results showed a strong increase in settlements in all administrative districts of the case study area since the 1850s. The total built-up area within the flooding zone of the investigated section of the Main river increased almost fivefold. Such expansion of settlement into the natural floodplains indicates a high growth in demand for flood regulation. Furthermore, our results suggest that flood exposure affected site selection of settlement in the past much stronger than it does today. Technical flood control (e.g. channels, dams and retention areas) reduced the area of settlement at risk for many towns in the case study region, but for some, it remains remarkably high.

[1]  H. Buiteveld,et al.  Impact of river training and retention measures on flood peaks along the Rhine , 2002 .

[2]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[3]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[4]  M. Antrop Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe , 2004 .

[5]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  Cost benefit analysis and flood damage mitigation in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[6]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[7]  Uwe Koenzen,et al.  Flussauen in Deutschland : Erfassung und Bewertung des Auenzustandes , 2009 .

[8]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[9]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe , 2014 .

[10]  Li Zhang,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of rural–urban land conversion , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[12]  Hans Juergen Boehmer,et al.  Analysis of land-use change in a sector of Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) since 1850 using land register records , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[14]  Statistisches Landesamt Nordrhein-Westfalen,et al.  Die Erwerbstätigen in Nordrhein-Westfalen nach der wirtschaftlichen Gliederung am 27. Mai 1970 : Ergebnisse der Volkszählung 1970 , 1972 .

[15]  J. Sui,et al.  Characteristics of Rainfall, Snowmelt and Runoff in the Headwater Region of the Main River Watershed in Germany , 2010 .

[16]  P. Döll,et al.  Assessing river flood risk and adaptation in Europe—review of projections for the future , 2010 .

[17]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data , 2011 .

[18]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[19]  A. Chin Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context , 2006 .

[20]  Helge Bormann,et al.  Simulated impact of past and possible future land use changes on the hydrological response of the Northern German lowland 'Hunte' catchment. , 2010 .

[21]  B. Merz,et al.  Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany , 2011 .

[22]  Peter Höppe,et al.  Confronting Disaster Losses , 2007, Science.

[23]  U. Walz,et al.  Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics , 2012 .

[24]  T. Foken Das Klima von Bayreuth , 2007 .

[25]  Jutta Thielen,et al.  The influence of historic land use changes and future planned land use scenarios on floods in the Oder catchment , 2003 .

[26]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[27]  B. Merz,et al.  Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002 , 2009 .

[28]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSIT ¨ AT FREIBURG , 2006 .

[29]  Gilbert F. White,et al.  Natural Hazards, Local, National, Global , 1976 .

[30]  V. Bell,et al.  The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria , 2012 .

[32]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[33]  Annegret H. Thieken,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics in the flood exposure due to land use changes in the Alpine Lech Valley in Tyrol (Austria) , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[34]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands , 2008 .

[35]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  National-scale Assessment of Current and Future Flood Risk in England and Wales , 2005 .

[36]  J. Kok,et al.  Large-scale assessment of flood risk and the effects of mitigation measures along the Elbe River , 2010 .

[37]  Daniela Molinari,et al.  Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies , 2012, Natural Hazards.