EMERGING POWERS AND PEACE NEGOTIATIONS: THE EXPERIENCE OF BRAZIL IN THE NUCLEAR TALKS WITH IRAN

This paper addresses the role of emerging powers and the importance of Southern soft power resources in global peace negotiations. It aims to examine the performance of Brazil as a contributor to peaceful solutions and the de-escalation of international security tension. Brazilian assertive diplomacy during the Lula da Silva government (2003-2010) made special efforts to build bridges in international negotiations to transcend deadlock scenarios. This text will focus specifically on the 2010 Brazil-Turkey joint initiative – known as the Teheran Declaration – set forward to mitigate the international tensions caused by the Iranian nuclear program. Both countries worked together to persuade Iran to accept a fuel swap deal which could de-rail a new round of United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran. The failure to change the course of Western-led coercive actions indicates the restraints emerging powers face as peace intermediators in global security.  The lack of acknowledgement from Western powers, while effective to reverse the success of the Brazilian-Turkey initiative, also postponed positive outcomes in international negotiations with Iran. This text suggests re-visiting the consequences of this postponement, particularly after the Trump administration has walked away from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran.

[1]  Suhnaz Yilmaz,et al.  The precarious role of emerging powers in a transforming international order: the Brazilian and Turkish initiative for a nuclear deal with Iran , 2019 .

[2]  Feliciano De Sá Guimarães,et al.  From Middle Powers to Entrepreneurial Powers in World Politics: Brazil's Successes and Failures in International Crises , 2017 .

[3]  C. Milani,et al.  Brazil’s foreign policy and the ‘graduation dilemma’ , 2017 .

[4]  Harold A. Trinkunas,et al.  Aspirational Power: Brazil on the Long Road to Global Influence , 2016 .

[5]  S. Eckert,et al.  Targeted Sanctions: The Impacts and Effectiveness of United Nations Action , 2016 .

[6]  G. Gardini Brazil: What Rise of What Power? , 2016 .

[7]  Aytekin Cantekin Ripeness and readiness theories in international conflict resolution. , 2016 .

[8]  M. Hirst Emerging Brazil: The Challenges of Liberal Peace and Global Governance , 2015 .

[9]  Fatih Hacipasalioglu The significance of 2010 Iran-Turkey-Brazil nuclear deal for Turkey and Brazil , 2014 .

[10]  A. B. D. Rocha,et al.  Iran Talks: Das Palavras aos Atos. A Declaração de Teerã e o Plano de Ação Conjunto de Genebra em Perspectiva , 2014 .

[11]  T. M. P. G. Manzur A política externa independente (PEI): antecedentes, apogeu e declínio , 2014 .

[12]  M. Hirst,et al.  Rethinking Global and Domestic Challenges in Brazilian Foreign Policy , 2014 .

[13]  P. Ferdinand Rising powers at the UN: an analysis of the voting behaviour of brics in the General Assembly , 2014 .

[14]  Togzhan Kassenova Brazil’s Nuclear Kaleidoscope: An Evolving Identity , 2014 .

[15]  Paul Amar The Middle East and Brazil: Perspectives on the New Global South , 2014 .

[16]  Sean W. Burges Mistaking Brazil for a Middle Power , 2013 .

[17]  Asli U. Bali Negotiating Non-Proliferation: International Law and Delegation in the Iranian Nuclear Crisis , 2013 .

[18]  Daniel Flemes,et al.  Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World: an introductory review , 2013 .

[19]  A. Hurrell Narratives of Emergence: Rising Powers and the End of the Third World? , 2013 .

[20]  A. Silva,et al.  O Oriente Médio na política externa brasileira (1947-2011): aproximação, distanciamento e engajamento , 2012 .

[21]  P. Dauvergne,et al.  The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power , 2012 .

[22]  L. Goetschel Neutrals as brokers of peacebuilding ideas? , 2011 .

[23]  A. Malamud A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy , 2011, Latin American Politics and Society.

[24]  M. Ozkan Turkey–Brazil Involvement in Iranian Nuclear Issue: What Is the Big Deal? , 2010 .

[25]  R. Ricupero À sombra de Charles de Gaulle: uma diplomacia carismática e intransferível. A política externa do governo Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010) , 2010 .

[26]  C. Patti Brazil and the nuclear issues in the years of the Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva government (2003-2010) , 2010 .

[27]  Tullo Vigevani,et al.  Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times: The Quest for Autonomy from Sarney to Lula , 2009 .

[28]  Rahman G. Bonab Turkey's Emerging Role as a Mediator on Iran's Nuclear Activities , 2009 .

[29]  A. Hurrell Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would‐be great powers? , 2006 .

[30]  M. Hirst,et al.  Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities , 2006 .

[31]  B. Russett,et al.  Peacemaking and Conflict Resolution , 2002 .

[32]  Ronald Reagan,et al.  National Security Strategy of the United States. , 1988 .