Metabolomics of plant volatiles.

Plants communicate with their surrounding ecosystems using a diverse array of volatile metabolites that are indicative of the physiological status of the emitter. A variety of systems have been adapted to capture, analyze, identify, and quantify airborne metabolites released by plants. Metabolomic experiments typically involve four steps: sample collection, preparation, product separation, and data analysis. To date, two different types of headspace sampling, static and dynamic, are widely used for volatile metabolome investigation. For static headspace analysis, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is used to sample volatiles while push and pull as well as closed-loop stripping methods are used for dynamic headspace sampling. After collection, volatile blends are most efficiently and routinely separated prior to analysis using gas chromatography (GC). Sample preparation is simplified because derivatization is not needed with volatile metabolites. GC coupled to detection by electron impact mass spectrometry (EI-MS) provides high chromatographic resolution, sensitivity, compound-specific detection, quantitation, and the potential to identify unknowns by characteristic and reproducible fragmentation spectra in addition to retention time. A variety of resources can be used to identify unknown compounds in a given volatile sample including >600,000 compounds with known mass spectra catalogued in searchable mass spectral libraries.

[1]  R. Raguso,et al.  Dynamic headspace analysis of floral volatiles: A comparison of methods , 1998 .

[2]  J. Noel,et al.  Biosynthesis of Plant Volatiles: Nature's Diversity and Ingenuity , 2006, Science.

[3]  P. Bednář,et al.  SPME – A valuable tool for investigation of flower scent , 2003 .

[4]  D. Tholl 1 Detection and Identification of Floral Scent Compounds , 2006 .

[5]  V. Schurig Chiral separations using gas chromatography , 2002 .

[6]  N. Dudareva,et al.  Plant Volatiles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives , 2006 .

[7]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  Diversity and distribution of floral scent , 2006, The Botanical Review.

[8]  C. Bicchi,et al.  Influence of fibre coating in headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatographic analysis of aromatic and medicinal plants. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  Jörg-Peter Schnitzler,et al.  Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[10]  A. Aharoni,et al.  Terpenoid Metabolism in Wild-Type and Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants Online version contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.016253. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[11]  T. C. Turlings,et al.  Advances and challenges in the identification of volatiles that mediate interactions among plants and arthropods. , 2006, The Analyst.

[12]  J. Pawliszyn,et al.  Theory of analyte extraction by selected porous polymer SPME fibres , 1999 .

[13]  G. Vas,et al.  Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. , 2004, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[14]  J. Pawliszyn,et al.  Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers , 1990 .

[15]  V. Schurig Separation of enantiomers by gas chromatography. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.