Post-intensive care syndrome in primary care: The development of new diseases and primary care services utilisation – a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Patients experience long-lasting health problems defined as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Little is known about PICS in primary care. Objectives To investigate whether ICU survivors encounter more new International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) diagnoses and general practitioner (GP) contact compared to patients with similar comorbidity without ICU admission. Methods Prospective multicentre cohort study in three Dutch general practices. Numbers of disease-episodes and GP contacts of ICU survivors ≥ 16 years admitted between 2008 and 2017 were extracted from GPs’ information systems. A non-ICU reference cohort was matched 1:1 for age, sex, follow-up period and comorbidity groups from patients’ medical history. Negative binominal regression analysis was used to compare both cohorts 0–3, 3–6, 6–12 months, 1–2 and 2–5 years after ICU admission and 1 year prior to admission. Results ICU survivors (n = 199) encountered more new disease-episodes 1 year before (mean 3.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.50–4.52]]; reference 2.36 [1.28–3.17]) to 2–5 years after ICU admission (3.65 [3.15–4.26]; reference 2.86 [2.52–3.22]). ICU survivors also had more GP contacts 1 year before (mean 19.61 [17.31–22.17]; reference 10.02 [7.81–12.38]) to 2–5 years after ICU admission (18.53 [15.58–21.85]; reference 12.03 [10.33–13.91]). Patients with prior ICU admission did not encounter patterns in specific ICPC-2 chapters compared to non-ICU patients. Conclusion Patients admitted to the ICU encounter more new primary care disease-episodes and GP contacts. As patients present their symptoms to their GP first, it is therefore up to the GP to recognise these critical illness-related symptoms.

[1]  D. Gommers,et al.  Familiarity with the post-intensive care syndrome among general practitioners and opportunities to improve their involvement in ICU follow-up care , 2022, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  M. Zegers,et al.  The impact of an intensive care unit admission on the health status of relatives of intensive care survivors: A prospective cohort study in primary care , 2022, The European journal of general practice.

[3]  David A. Braude,et al.  Post-intensive care syndrome: Screening and management in primary care. , 2021, Australian journal of general practice.

[4]  J. Chase,et al.  Post-intensive care syndrome after a critical COVID-19: cohort study from a Belgian follow-up clinic , 2021, Annals of Intensive Care.

[5]  C. van Weel,et al.  Purposeful Incorporation of Patient Narratives in the Medical Record in the Netherlands , 2021, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[6]  M. Zegers,et al.  Development of a practically usable prediction model for quality of life of ICU survivors: A sub-analysis of the MONITOR-IC prospective cohort study. , 2021, Journal of critical care.

[7]  D. Needham,et al.  Society of Critical Care Medicine’s International Consensus Conference on Prediction and Identification of Long-Term Impairments After Critical Illness , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[8]  R. Mani Postintensive Care Syndrome: The Aftermath , 2020, Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.

[9]  Ashley De Bie,et al.  Post-icu care after a long intensive care admission : a Dutch inventory study , 2019 .

[10]  D. D. de Lange,et al.  A comparison of very old patients admitted to intensive care unit after acute versus elective surgery or intervention. , 2019, Journal of critical care.

[11]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  Dutch ICU survivors have more consultations with general practitioners before and after ICU admission compared to a matched control group from the general population , 2019, PloS one.

[12]  D. Harrison,et al.  Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: a UK-wide prospective cohort study , 2018, Critical Care.

[13]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  Healthcare costs of ICU survivors are higher before and after ICU admission compared to a population based control group: A descriptive study combining healthcare insurance data and data from a Dutch national quality registry , 2018, Journal of critical care.

[14]  D. Needham,et al.  Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together—a consensus of 29 , 2017, Critical Care.

[15]  P. Leutscher,et al.  [Post intensive care syndrome]. , 2017, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[16]  S. Yadav,et al.  Post-intensive care syndrome: An overview , 2017, Journal of translational internal medicine.

[17]  L. Kaplan,et al.  Post-ICU syndrome: Rescuing the undiagnosed , 2016, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[18]  S. Zwakhalen,et al.  Healthcare resource utilisation by critically ill older patients following an intensive care unit stay. , 2015, Journal of clinical nursing.

[19]  K. Lomborg,et al.  Rehabilitation activities, out-patient visits and employment in patients and partners the first year after ICU: a descriptive study. , 2014, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[20]  Abhi Shelat,et al.  One‐to‐many propensity score matching in cohort studies , 2012, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[21]  D. Needham,et al.  Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders' conference* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[22]  Julie Powell Caring for patients after an ICU admission. , 2002, Nursing New Zealand.

[23]  E. Mulvey,et al.  Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  C. van Weel,et al.  The COVID-19 Pandemic in Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Changes in Presented Health Problems and Demand for Primary Care , 2021, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[25]  L. Hingstman,et al.  Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen: peiling 2007. , 2002 .