The "motion silencing" illusion results from global motion and crowding.

Suchow and Alvarez (2011) recently devised a striking illusion, where objects changing in color, luminance, size, or shape appear to stop changing when they move. They refer to the illusion as "motion silencing of awareness to visual change." Here we present evidence that the illusion results from two perceptual processes: global motion and crowding. We adapted Suchow and Alvarez's stimulus to three concentric rings of dots, a central ring of "target dots" flanked on either side by similarly moving flanker dots. Subjects had to identify in which of two presentations the target dots were continuously changing (sinusoidally) in size, as distinct from the other interval in which size was constant. The results show: (a) Motion silencing depends on target speed, with a threshold around 0.2 rotations per second (corresponding to about 10°/s linear motion). (b) Silencing depends on both target-flanker spacing and eccentricity, with critical spacing about half eccentricity, consistent with Bouma's law. (c) The critical spacing was independent of stimulus size, again consistent with Bouma's law. (d) Critical spacing depended strongly on contrast polarity. All results imply that the "motion silencing" illusion may result from crowding.

[1]  S. Dakin,et al.  The shape and size of crowding for moving targets , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Crowding in Peripheral Vision: Why Bigger Is Better , 2009, Current Biology.

[4]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Dakin,et al.  Spatial interference among moving targets , 2005, Vision Research.

[6]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[9]  John D. Mollon,et al.  Enhanced discrimination at a perceptual category boundary: Subjective and performance measures are concomitantly shifted by chromatic adaptation. , 2012 .

[10]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  "Non-retinotopic processing" in Ternus motion displays modeled by spatiotemporal filters. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[12]  C. Hawryshyn,et al.  Visual Perception: More than Meets the Eye° , 2001 .

[13]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[14]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[15]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Burr,et al.  Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals , 2000, Current Biology.

[18]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[19]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[21]  Bilge Sayim,et al.  Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[22]  Jordan W. Suchow,et al.  Motion Silences Awareness of Visual Change , 2011, Current Biology.

[23]  David Whitney,et al.  Perceived Positions Determine Crowding , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[26]  D. Simons.  In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[27]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Blindness to a simultaneous change of all elements in a scene, unless there is a change in summary statistics. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[28]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.