Biodiversity in model ecosystems, I: coexistence conditions for competing species.

This is the first of two papers where we discuss the limits imposed by competition to the biodiversity of species communities. In this first paper, we study the coexistence of competing species at the fixed point of population dynamic equations. For many simple models, this imposes a limit on the width of the productivity distribution, which is more severe the more diverse the ecosystem is (1994, Theor. Popul. Biol. 45, 227-276). Here we review and generalize this analysis, beyond the "mean-field"-like approximation of the competition matrix used in previous works, and extend it to structured food webs. In all cases analysed, we obtain qualitatively similar relations between biodiversity and competition: the narrower the productivity distribution is, the more species can stably coexist. We discuss how this result, considered together with environmental fluctuations, limits the maximal biodiversity that a trophic level can host.

[1]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  U Bastolla,et al.  Diversity patterns from ecological models at dynamical equilibrium. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  V. Jansen,et al.  Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversity , 2002 .

[4]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[5]  M. Wells,et al.  Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together , 2006 .

[6]  A. Provenzale,et al.  Mesoscale vortices and the paradox of the plankton , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[8]  Lewi Stone,et al.  Advantageous indirect interactions in systems of competition. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[10]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Stability and complexity of spatially extended two-species competition* , 1992 .

[11]  P. J. den Boer.  The present status of the competitive exclusion principle. , 1986, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[13]  L. Ginzburg,et al.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[15]  R. Macarthur,et al.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Chesson.  Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[17]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[18]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  S. Levin.  Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Charles M. Newman,et al.  Community Food Webs , 1990 .

[21]  V. Volterra.  Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together , 1928 .

[22]  B. Drossel,et al.  The influence of predator--prey population dynamics on the long-term evolution of food web structure. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  J. Diamond.  Niche Shifts and the Rediscovery of Interspecific Competition , 1978 .

[25]  P. Chesson.  Understanding the role of environmental variation in population and community dynamics , 2003 .

[26]  G. Hardin.  The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[27]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Competitive coexistence of two predators utilizing the same prey under constant environmental conditions. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[29]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Coexistence resulting from an alternation of density dependent and density independent growth. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  M. Lässig,et al.  Shape of ecological networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[32]  R. Solé,et al.  Scaling in a network model of a multispecies ecosystem , 2000 .

[33]  J. Yorke,et al.  Competitive Exclusion and Nonequilibrium Coexistence , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Caldarelli,et al.  Modelling Coevolution in Multispecies Communities. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  S. Schreiber,et al.  A supply/demand perspective of species invasions and coexistence: applications to biological control , 1998 .