Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States

Between 1898 and 1918, voters in 20 American states adopted constitutional amendments granting citizens the power of the initiative. The embrace of direct democracy by voters invites inquiry into why some state legislatures opted to delegate to citizens the power of the initiative, while others did not. Drawing on an original data set, this article uses Event History Analysis hazard models to explain the puzzle of why legislatures might devolve institutional power to citizens. Our longitudinal, macrolevel analysis of socioeconomic and political forces reveals that political considerations—interparty legislative competition, party organizational strength, and third parties—are the most powerful predictors of a legislature's decision to refer the initiative to the ballot. Although several of our findings comport with the conventional wisdom explaining the adoption of the initiative during the Progressive Era, others are surprising, offering us new theoretical insights into why and when legislative bodies might be willing to divest themselves of their institutional power.

[1]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment , 1977 .

[2]  Martin Shefter,et al.  Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. , 1994 .

[3]  J. P. Rui,et al.  Endogenous Budget Institutions And Political Insulation: Why States Adopt The Item Veto , 2001 .

[4]  S. Bowler,et al.  Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America , 2006 .

[5]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process , 1991 .

[6]  Cecil J. Schneer,et al.  The Search for Order , 1960 .

[7]  Daniel A. Smith.  Tax crusaders and the politics of direct democracy , 1998 .

[8]  Daniel Carpenter,et al.  The forging of bureaucratic autonomy : reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928 , 2001 .

[9]  Lee Ann Banaszak.  Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Woman Suffrage , 1996 .

[10]  W. S. Sayre,et al.  American State Politics: An Introduction , 1983 .

[11]  D. Smith,et al.  Direct Democracy During the Progressive Era: A Crack in the Populist Veneer? , 2002, Journal of Policy History.

[12]  Daniel A. Smith.  For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  E. Clemens,et al.  The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. , 1997 .

[14]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States , 2004 .

[15]  Leon D. Epstein.  Political Parties in the American Mold , 1986 .

[16]  V. O. Key,et al.  Southern Politics In State and Nation , 1984 .

[17]  H. Hamilton.  Direct Legislation: Some Implications of Open Housing Referenda , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[18]  L. Kenny,et al.  Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government? , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy , 2002 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Alan Ware.  Placing parties in American politics: organization, electoral settings, and government activity in the twentieth century , 1987 .

[23]  G. E. Berrios,et al.  . New York: Cambridge , 2000 .

[24]  Jocelyn Elise Crowley,et al.  The Rush to Organize: Explaining Associational Formation in the United States, 1860s-1920s , 2001 .

[25]  K. Mattson.  Creating a Democratic Public: The Struggle for Urban Participatory Democracy During the Progressive Era , 1997 .

[26]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[27]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed , 2000 .

[28]  Robert,et al.  An Age of Reform , 1969 .

[29]  Keith E. Whittington,et al.  Executive Power in American Institutional Development , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[30]  Sven Steinmo,et al.  Structuring politics : historical institutionalism in comparative analysis , 1992 .

[31]  L. Dodd.  The Dynamics Of American Politics: Approaches And Interpretations , 1993 .

[32]  Elinor Scarbrough,et al.  Research strategies in the social sciences : a guide to new approaches , 1998 .

[33]  S. Skowronek,et al.  Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century@@@Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 , 1984 .

[34]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[35]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking , 1998 .

[36]  Thomas E. Cronin,et al.  Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall@@@Citizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution , 1991 .

[37]  G. Mowry.  The South and the Progressive Lily White Party of 1912 , 1940 .

[38]  A. Alexandroff.  Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 Stephen Skowronek Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. x, 389 , 1983, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[39]  Roger W. Lotchin.  The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898-1998 , 2000 .

[40]  Clive Bean,et al.  Parties and elections , 1997 .

[41]  Sidney M. Milkis,et al.  “Direct Democracy” and Social Justice: The Progressive Party Campaign of 1912 , 1994, Studies in American Political Development.

[42]  S. Skowronek,et al.  The Search for American Political Development by Karen Orren , 2004 .

[43]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy , 2001 .

[44]  John W. Malsberger.  Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America , 2003 .

[45]  N. Lamoreaux,et al.  The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890-1916: The Market, the Law, and Politics , 1990 .

[46]  Scott C. James.  Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884-1936 , 2000 .

[47]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2004 .

[48]  Martin Shefter,et al.  Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. , 1995 .

[49]  Nathaniel N. Beck.  Modelling Space and Time: The Event History Approach , 1999 .

[50]  S. G. Lowrie.  Initiative and Referendum: California , 1911, American Political Science Review.

[51]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Electoral Competition in the American States , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[52]  Caroline J. Tolbert.  Direct Democracy and Institutional Realignment in the American States , 2003 .

[53]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Protecting soldiers and mothers : the political origins of social policy in the United States , 1993 .

[54]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  When Does Government Limit the Impact of Voter Initiatives? The Politics of Implementation and Enforcement , 2004, The Journal of Politics.

[55]  P. H. Argersinger.  "A Place on the Ballot": Fusion Politics and Antifusion Laws , 1980 .

[56]  S. Skowronek,et al.  The Search for American Political Development , 2004 .

[57]  Sarah A. Binder,et al.  Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress , 1997 .

[58]  Richard G. Smolka.  The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910: Kousser, J. Morgan: (Yale Historical Publications Miscellany, No. 102): New Havcn, Conn.: Yale University Press, 319 pp., Publication Date: October 16, 1974 , 1975 .

[59]  J. Garner.  Primary vs. Representative Government , 1907 .

[60]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story , 1990 .

[61]  V. Key,et al.  The initiative and the referendum in California , 1951 .

[62]  Devaluation of the urban and suburban vote , 1961 .

[63]  Richard I. Hofferbert,et al.  Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[64]  B. Geddes.  How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics , 1990, Political Analysis.

[65]  M. Jewell,et al.  STATES AS LABORATORIES: A Reprise , 2004 .

[66]  A. Megill,et al.  Recounting the Past: “Description,” Explanation, and Narrative in Historiography , 1989 .

[67]  Alan Ware.  The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North , 2002 .

[68]  J. Karp,et al.  When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations , 2002 .

[69]  R. B. Hackey,et al.  The politics of reform. , 2000, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[70]  Steven L. Piott.  Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America , 2003 .

[71]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[72]  William F. Connelly,et al.  Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House , 1992 .

[73]  J. Kallenbach,et al.  American State Governors, 1776-1976 , 1977 .

[74]  Christopher Zorn,et al.  A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models , 2005, Political Analysis.

[75]  David B. Magleby.  Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States , 1984 .

[76]  J. Huthmacher.  Urban Liberalism and the Age of Reform , 1962 .

[77]  L. Sabato,et al.  Dangerous democracy? : the battle over ballot initiatives in America , 2001 .

[78]  C. M. Price.  The Initiative: a Comparative State Analysis and Reassessment of a Western Phenomenon , 1975 .

[79]  R. Ellis.  Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America , 2002 .

[80]  Lloyd L. Sponholtz.  The Initiative and Referendum: Direct democracy in perspective, 1898-1920 , 1973 .

[81]  Robert C. Lowry,et al.  Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[82]  George Douglas Dion.  Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics , 2001 .

[83]  J. Matsusaka.  Initiative and Referendum , 2004 .

[84]  C. Mooney.  Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion , 2001 .

[85]  David R. Mayhew.  Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century , 1986 .

[86]  S. Scarrow.  Party Competition and Institutional Change , 1997 .

[87]  E. Mcdonagh.  Representative Democracy and State Building in the Progressive Era , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[88]  D. Thelen.  Social Tensions and the Origins of Progressivism , 1969 .

[89]  C. B. Galbreath.  Provisions for State-Wide Initiative and Referendum , 1912 .

[90]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[91]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House , 1993 .

[92]  J. Gill.  Essential Mathematics for Political and Social Research , 2006 .

[93]  J. Berry.  The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. Elisabeth S. Clemens , 1998 .

[94]  C. Beard,et al.  Documents on the State-Wide Initiative: Referendum and Recall , 2009 .

[95]  B. Geddes.  A Game Theoretic Model of Reform in Latin American Democracies , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[96]  Woman Suffrage in the Progressive Era: Patterns of Opposition and Support in Referenda Voting, 1910-1918 , 1985 .

[97]  T. Skocpol.  Protecting Soldiers And Mothers , 1992 .

[98]  Christopher Howard,et al.  Women's Associations and the Enactment of Mothers' Pensions in the United States , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[99]  David W. Rohde.  Parties and leaders in the postreform house , 1991 .

[100]  T. Goebel.  A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890-1940 , 2002 .

[101]  J. M. Kousser,et al.  The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910 , 1974 .

[102]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[103]  Alexander Keyssar,et al.  The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States , 2000 .

[104]  B. Rosenson.  The Shadowlands of Conduct: Ethics and State Politics , 2005 .

[105]  D. D. Schmidt.  Citizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution , 1989 .

[106]  Hal Brands,et al.  The Search for Order , 2008 .