Determination of Weights for the Ultimate Cross Efficiency: A Use of Principal Component Analysis Technique

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has becoming more and more important in evaluating the performance of homogenous Decision Making Units (DMUs). Cross efficiency evaluation method, a DEA extension technique, can be utilized to identify efficient DMUs and to rank DMUs in a peer appraisal mode, instead of a pure self-evaluation of traditional DEA models. Traditionally, the ultimate cross efficiency is determined based on the average assumption. However it cannot ensure this result contains the most information of the cross-efficiency matrix (CEM). In the current paper, we use principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the ultimate cross-efficiency of each DMU and then rank them. Compared with the tradition average cross efficiency evaluation method, the method proposed in this paper can contain the most of the information of CEM. Finally, an empirical example is illustrated to examine the validity of the proposed method.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Stability of efficiency evaluations in data envelopment analysis , 1989, ZOR Methods Model. Oper. Res..

[2]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Restricting weights in supplier selection decisions in the presence of dual-role factors , 2010 .

[3]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimensionality of data sets with PCA , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Priority estimation in the AHP through maximization of correlation coefficient , 2007 .

[6]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Location optimization of solar plants by an integrated hierarchical DEA PCA approach , 2008 .

[7]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[9]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Muhittin Oral,et al.  A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects , 1991 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[12]  W. Cook,et al.  Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation , 1996 .

[13]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2011 .

[14]  A. Azadeh,et al.  Location Optimization of Solar Plants by an Integrated Multivariable DEA-PCA Method , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[15]  Han Jiu-xiang Evaluation of Distributors Using PCA-DEA Algorithmic Model , 2005 .

[16]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .