Integrating computer-based de novo drug design and multidimensional filtering for desirable drugs

Abstract In the pharmaceutical industry today, many of the potent compounds discovered using expensive technologies are eventually rejected because of poor physicochemical or absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology (ADME/Tox) properties. This problem can be addressed by placing fast and accurate computational technologies at the heart of drug discovery. Chemically diverse and potent compounds generated by de novo design algorithms are scored for ADME/Tox properties using rigorously validated statistical models. Every molecule passing through this in silico pipeline is thus associated with a wealth of predicted properties, thereby allowing for rapid assessment to determine which molecule should be further developed. Critical to this idea is a platform that allows for the efficient exchange of in silico and experimental data between all scientists regardless of specialization. By bridging the gap between the in silico and experimental cultures in this fashion, an information-driven, cost-effective drug discovery program can be realized.

[1]  D. Joseph-McCarthy,et al.  Computational approaches to structure-based ligand design. , 1999, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[2]  James W. McFarland,et al.  A Novel Approach for Prediction of Intestinal Absorption of Drugs in Humans based on Hydrogen Bond Descriptors and Structural Similarity , 2001 .

[3]  G Beck,et al.  Evaluation of human intestinal absorption data and subsequent derivation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) with the Abraham descriptors. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  S. Ekins,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of inhibitors of P-glycoprotein. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[5]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[6]  W. Crumb,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship for inhibition of human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channel. , 2002, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[7]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Guido Tiana,et al.  Protein folding, evolution and design , 2001 .

[9]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Paul W. Buehler,et al.  Comparison of Oral Absorption and Bioavailability of Drugs Between Monkey and Human , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[11]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Combinatorial Library Design Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[12]  T. Creighton,et al.  Protein Folding , 1992 .

[13]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Toward a pharmacophore for drugs inducing the long QT syndrome: insights from a CoMFA study of HERG K(+) channel blockers. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Barbara M. Bolten,et al.  Trends in development cycles , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  Kurt Binder,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics , 1992, Graduate Texts in Physics.

[17]  Klaus Gubernator,et al.  Structure-Based Ligand Design , 1995 .

[18]  A. Barve,et al.  Linear Correlation of the Fraction of Oral Dose Absorbed of 64 Drugs Between Humans and Rats , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[19]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Osman F. Güner,et al.  Pharmacophore perception, development, and use in drug design , 2000 .

[21]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  H. Kubinyi QSAR and 3D QSAR in drug design Part 1: methodology , 1997 .

[24]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[25]  Hyunyoung Jeong,et al.  Evaluation of Using Dog as an Animal Model to Study the Fraction of Oral Dose Absorbed of 43 Drugs in Humans , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[26]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 1993 .

[27]  Wolfgang Guba,et al.  Development of a virtual screening method for identification of "frequent hitters" in compound libraries. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  M F Engels,et al.  Smart screening: approaches to efficient HTS. , 2001, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[29]  G. Klebe,et al.  Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  S. Ekins,et al.  Progress in predicting human ADME parameters in silico. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[31]  John Bradshaw,et al.  Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[32]  G. Bemis,et al.  Properties of known drugs. 2. Side chains. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  A Virtual Screening Method for Prediction of the hERG Potassium Channel Liability of Compound Libraries , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[34]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  C. Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[36]  Bruno Boulanger,et al.  Towards a new age of virtual ADME/TOX and multidimensional drug discovery , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[37]  Bartosz A Grzybowski,et al.  From knowledge-based potentials to combinatorial lead design in silico. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[38]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  S. Ekins,et al.  Application of three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of P-glycoprotein inhibitors and substrates. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[40]  Charles J. Manly,et al.  The impact of informatics and computational chemistry on synthesis and screening. , 2001, Drug discovery today.

[41]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[42]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Successful virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Bioinformatics - the machine learning approach (2. ed.) , 2000 .

[44]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  D. Agrafiotis,et al.  Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[46]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[47]  David M. Webster,et al.  Protein structure prediction : methods and protocols , 2000 .

[48]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[49]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Analysis of knowledge‐based protein‐ligand potentials using a self‐consistent method , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[50]  J J Baldwin,et al.  Prediction of drug absorption using multivariate statistics. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[52]  G. Klebe,et al.  DrugScore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[53]  Ajay,et al.  Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Why do protein architectures have boltzmann‐like statistics? , 1995, Proteins.

[55]  Michael S. Waterman,et al.  Introduction to Computational Biology: Maps, Sequences and Genomes , 1998 .

[56]  P. Kollman Recent Advances in Structure-Based Ligand Design Using Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Methods , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[57]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[58]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[59]  S. Ekins,et al.  Pharmacophore and three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship methods for modeling cytochrome p450 active sites. , 2001, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[60]  M. Yazdanian,et al.  Correlating Partitioning and Caco-2 Cell Permeability of Structurally Diverse Small Molecular Weight Compounds , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[61]  A. Fersht Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[62]  Gerard T. Barkema,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics , 1999 .

[63]  I. R. Mcdonald,et al.  Theory of simple liquids , 1998 .

[64]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.