Evaluation of mammograms for artifacts is essential for mammographic quality assurance. A variety of mammographic artifacts (i.e., variations in mammographic density not caused by true attenuation differences) can occur and can create pseudolesions or mask true abnormalities. Many artifacts are readily identified, whereas others present a true diagnostic challenge. Factors that create artifacts may be related to the processor (eg, static, dirt or excessive developer buildup on the rollers, excessive roller pressure, damp film, scrapes and scratches, incomplete fixing, power failure, contaminated developer), the technologist (eg, improper film handling and loading, improper use of the mammography unit and related equipment, positioning and darkroom errors), the mammography unit (eg, failure of the collimation mirror to rotate, grid inhomogeneity, failure of the reciprocating grid to move, material in the tube housing, compression failure, improper alignment of the compression paddle with the Bucky tray, defective compression paddle), or the patient (e.g., motion, superimposed objects or substances [jewelry, body parts, clothing, hair, implanted medical devices, foreign bodies, substances on the skin]). Familiarity with the broad range of artifacts and the measures required to eliminate them is vital. Careful attention to darkroom cleanliness, care in film handling, regularly scheduled processor maintenance and chemical replenishment, daily quality assurance activities, and careful attention to detail during patient positioning and mammography can reduce or eliminate most mammographic artifacts.
[1]
L. Liberman,et al.
Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
,
1997,
Radiology.
[2]
G Cardenosa,et al.
Assessing adequacy of mammographic image quality.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[3]
L. Bassett,et al.
Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
,
1994,
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[4]
R. Beres,et al.
Percutaneous repair of breast pseudoaneurysm: sonographically guided embolization.
,
1997,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5]
P. Dempsey,et al.
Mammography of breasts in which catheter cuffs have been retained: normal, infected, and postoperative appearances.
,
1997,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[6]
B. Fornage.
Sonographic diagnosis of a retained surgical sponge in the breast
,
1987,
Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.
[7]
L. Fajardo,et al.
Placement of endovascular embolization microcoils to localize the site of breast lesions removed at stereotactic core biopsy.
,
1998,
Radiology.