Multimarker Approach to Risk Stratification in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Simultaneous Assessment of Troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide

Background—In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), troponin I (TnI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) each predict adverse cardiac events. Little is known, however, about the utility of these biomarkers in combination. Methods and Results—Baseline measurements of TnI, CRP, and BNP were performed in 450 patients in OPUS-TIMI 16. Elevations in TnI, CRP, and BNP each were independent predictors of the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or congestive heart failure (CHF). When patients were categorized on the basis of the number of elevated biomarkers at presentation, there was a near doubling of the mortality risk for each additional biomarker that was elevated (P =0.01). Similar relationships existed for the endpoints of MI, CHF, and the composite, both at 30 days and through 10 months. In a validation cohort of 1635 patients in TACTICS-TIMI 18, the number of elevated biomarkers remained a significant predictor of the composite endpoint after adjustment for known clinical predictors: patients with one, two, and three elevated biomarkers had a 2.1- (P =0.006), 3.1- (P <0.001), and 3.7- (P =0.001) fold increase in the risk of death, MI, or CHF by 6 months. Conclusions—Troponin, CRP, and BNP each provide unique prognostic information in patients with ACS. A simple multimarker strategy that categorizes patients based on the number of elevated biomarkers at presentation allows risk stratification over a broad range of short- and long-term major cardiac events.

[1]  E. Antman,et al.  C-Reactive Protein Is a Potent Predictor of Mortality Independently of and in Combination With Troponin T in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A TIMI 11A Substudy , 1998 .

[2]  M. Sabatine,et al.  The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Eorge,et al.  CARDIAC-SPECIFIC TROPONIN I LEVELS TO PREDICT THE RISK OF MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES , 2000 .

[6]  P. Ridker,et al.  C-reactive protein, inflammation, and coronary risk. , 2000, The Medical clinics of North America.

[7]  Pedro Lozano Natriuretic peptides. , 2020, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.

[8]  K. Williams,et al.  Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Skene,et al.  Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with orbofiban in patients with unstable coronary syndromes (OPUS-TIMI 16) trial. , 2000, Circulation.

[10]  Jack H. Ladenson,et al.  Cardiac Troponin I A Marker With High Specificity for Cardiac Injury , 1993, Circulation.

[11]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina: an etiologic approach to management. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  C. Visser,et al.  C-reactive protein as a cardiovascular risk factor: more than an epiphenomenon? , 1999, Circulation.

[13]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. , 2001, JAMA.