Automated identification of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics retinal images.

In making noninvasive measurements of the human cone mosaic, the task of labeling each individual cone is unavoidable. Manual labeling is a time-consuming process, setting the motivation for the development of an automated method. An automated algorithm for labeling cones in adaptive optics (AO) retinal images is implemented and tested on real data. The optical fiber properties of cones aided the design of the algorithm. Out of 2153 manually labeled cones from six different images, the automated method correctly identified 94.1% of them. The agreement between the automated and the manual labeling methods varied from 92.7% to 96.2% across the six images. Results between the two methods disagreed for 1.2% to 9.1% of the cones. Voronoi analysis of large montages of AO retinal images confirmed the general hexagonal-packing structure of retinal cones as well as the general cone density variability across portions of the retina. The consistency of our measurements demonstrates the reliability and practicality of having an automated solution to this problem.

[1]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[2]  David R Williams,et al.  Deconvolution of adaptive optics retinal images. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  David Williams Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye , 1988, Vision Research.

[4]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Stochastic sampling in computer graphics , 1988, TOGS.

[5]  A. Roorda,et al.  MEMS-based adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2006, Optics letters.

[6]  D. Williams,et al.  Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Siddharth Poonja,et al.  MEMS-based adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy , 2006 .

[8]  R.M. Mersereau,et al.  The processing of hexagonally sampled two-dimensional signals , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  F. M. de Monasterio,et al.  Regularity and Structure of the Spatial Pattern of Blue Cones of Macaque Retina , 1985 .

[10]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  D. Williams,et al.  Consequences of spatial sampling by a human photoreceptor mosaic. , 1983, Science.

[13]  David Williams,et al.  Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  C. Curcio,et al.  Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy. , 1992, Visual neuroscience.

[15]  David Williams,et al.  Optical fiber properties of individual human cones. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[16]  J. Enoch Optical Properties of the Retinal Receptors , 1963 .

[17]  David Williams Aliasing in human foveal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[18]  P. Lennie,et al.  Packing arrangement of the three cone classes in primate retina , 2001, Vision Research.

[19]  T. Hebert,et al.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2002, Optics express.

[20]  J. Yellott Spectral consequences of photoreceptor sampling in the rhesus retina. , 1983, Science.