Comparative Evaluation of Wound Outcome between Electrocautery and Scalpel Incision

Background: The use of cutting electrocautery instead of scalpel for skin incision is still suboptimal worldwide. There are many studies which include its use in general surgical operations but without use of prothetic material. Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the application of extreme heat by cutting electrocautery may result in significant postoperative pain and poor wound healing with increased risk of wound infection in presence of underlying prosthetic material and poor cosmesis because of excessive tissue damage and scarring respectively as per previous hypothesis or it’s safe and effective instead. Subjects and Methods: A total of 196 Patients were allocated consecutively to either electrocautery (n=98) or scalpel (n=98) groups. The duration used in making the skin incision; the incisional blood loss and the ensuing length and depth of the wound were noted. Postoperative pain; duration of wound healing and the occurrence of surgical site infection and cosmetic outcome were also noted. Results: The ages ranged from 16 to 73 years. The demography, case distribution and body mass index were similar in both groups. The incision time was shorter in the electrocautery group (P <0.001). The blood loss was less with the electrocautery compared to the scalpel (6.53±3.84 ml vs. 18.16±7.36 ml, P<0.001). The cumulative numerical rating scale score for pain was 12.65 (standard deviation SD 8.06) and 17.12 (SD 9.49) in the diathermy and scalpel groups respectively (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in wound infection and wound closure (epithelialization time) (P=0.206). Conclusion: The use of cutting electrocautery in making skin incision during inguinal hernioplasty is as safe as scalpel in terms of wound healing and cosmesis and is also associated with reduced incision time, incisional blood loss, and postoperative pain.

[1]  O. Afuwape,et al.  Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital , 2015, Nigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society.

[2]  P. K. Arya Surgical Incision by High Frequency Cautery , 2015, Indian Journal of Surgery.

[3]  J. Gilyoma,et al.  Diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study , 2013 .

[4]  H. S. Shukla,et al.  A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. , 2011, Indian journal of cancer.

[5]  A. Siraj,et al.  ELECTIVE MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY: COMPARISON OF DIATHERMY AND SCALPEL INCISIONS , 2011 .

[6]  A. Dellon,et al.  Historical development of bipolar coagulation , 2010, Microsurgery.

[7]  M. Shamim Diathermy vs. Scalpel Skin Incisions in General Surgery: Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  M. Özdoğan Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Dissections: The Effect on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid , 2008 .

[9]  O. Zoras,et al.  A Prospective Study Comparing Diathermy and Scalpel Incisions in Tension-Free Inguinal Hernioplasty , 2005, The American surgeon.

[10]  J. Janik Electric cautery lowers contamination threshold for infection by laparotomies. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[11]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[12]  S. Kearns,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  G. Groot,et al.  Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates. , 1994, American journal of surgery.

[14]  M A Memon,et al.  Surgical diathermy. , 1994, British journal of hospital medicine.

[15]  D. Galloway,et al.  Comparative study of abdominal incision techniques , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  P. Wicker Electrosurgery--Part I. The history of diathermy. , 1990, NATNews.

[17]  A. Dixon,et al.  Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial. , 1990, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[18]  S. Hussain,et al.  Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain , 1988, British Journal of Surgery.