Evaluation of Soil Survey Scale for Zone Development of Site-Specific Nitrogen Management

Zone sampling for site-specific N application has been shown to be effective in North Dakota and other areas of the Great Plains. Printed and sometimes digitized soil surveys are presently available for most agricultural counties in the USA. Order 2 soil surveys generally have scales that range from 1:12 000 to 1:31680. These surveys were developed for general planning purposes. There is interest in using Order 2 soil surveys as a basis for delineating N management zone patterns, especially where the soil-mapping units have been digitized. This study was conducted to evaluate soil survey scales at the Order 1 (scale >1:15 840) and Order 2 level against grid- and topography-based zone sampling to determine whether soil surveys at these scales could be used to delineate N management zones for site-specific fertilizer application. Fields mapped at a finer scale (Order 1 survey) showed some similarity between mapping units and N management zones defined by topography. Order 2 soil-mapping units, which are the present mapping scale of most agricultural soil surveys, were often not similar to N management zones. Published Order 2 soil surveys should not be used to develop N management zones for site-specific agriculture unless the soil patterns are verified with other zone development tools of site-specific management. Alternatively, a major benefit of Order 1 soil surveys would be to reinforce or redefine apparent N management zones.

[1]  V. L. Hofman,et al.  Soil Nutrient Relationships with Topography as Influenced by Crop , 1999, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  D. Karlen,et al.  An evaluation of soil survey crop yield interpretations for two central Iowa farms , 1997 .

[3]  Lawson D. Spivey,et al.  Application of Soil Survey Information to Soil Specific Farming , 1993 .

[4]  John S. Jacob,et al.  Quantifying Map Unit Composition for Quality Control in Soil Survey , 2015 .

[5]  Soil Sampling for Site-Specific Nitrogen Management , 1996 .

[6]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  The state of site specific management for agriculture. , 1997 .

[7]  David W. Franzen,et al.  Field Soil Sampling Density for Variable Rate Fertilization , 1995 .

[8]  David Lamb,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Remote-Sensing and Mapping of Weeds in Crops , 2001 .

[9]  M. Clayton,et al.  Mapping Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium for Variable‐Rate Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[10]  T. Peck,et al.  The Principles of Soil Testing , 1990, SSSA Book Series.

[11]  H. Jenny,et al.  Factors of Soil Formation , 1941 .

[12]  J. Sawyer.  Concepts of Variable Rate Technology with Considerations for Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[13]  T. S. Stombaugh,et al.  Site-specific farming: A perspective on information needs, benefits and limitations , 1999 .

[14]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Spatial variabilities of soils and landforms , 1991 .

[15]  V. Hofman,et al.  Topography‐Based Sampling Compared with Grid Sampling in the Northern Great Plains , 1998 .

[16]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  ASPECTS OF PRECISION AGRICULTURE , 1999 .

[17]  Gary W. Hergert,et al.  Adequacy of Current Fertilizer Recommendations for Site-Specific Management , 2015 .

[18]  G. A. Nielsen,et al.  Farming Soils, Not Fields: A Strategy for Increasing Fertilizer Profitability , 1991 .

[19]  J. Zupancic,et al.  Determination of soil nitrate by transnitration of salicylic acid , 1990 .

[20]  Soil Sampling Strategies for Estimating Residual Nitrogen , 1997 .