Of Techno-Ethics and Techno-Affects

As digital labour becomes more widespread across the uneven geographies of race, gender, class and ability, and as histories of colonialism and inequality get drawn into these forms of labour, our imagination of what these worlds contain similarly needs to expand. Beyond the sensationalist images of the ‘brogrammer’ and the call-centre worker lie intersecting labour practices that bring together histories of bodies and materiality in new ways. In the recent past, these entanglements have yielded oppressive results. As scandals over predictive policing, data mining and algorithmic racism unfold, digital labourers need both to be accounted for in analyses of algorithmic technologies and to be counted among the designers of these platforms. This article attempts to do both of these by highlighting particular cases in which digital labour frames embodied subjects, and to propose ways digital workers might train themselves to recognise ethical problems as they are emerging. I use the idea of attunements as a way to grasp what these forms of care might look like for the digital worker.

[1]  K. Kenny Frames of war: when is life grievable? , 2010 .

[2]  Utsa Mukherjee High-tech housewives: Indian IT workers, gendered labor, and transmigration , 2018, Contemporary South Asia.

[3]  Benjamin Van Roy The Tuskegee syphilis experiment: medical ethics, constitutionalism, and property in the body. , 1995, The Harvard journal of minority public health.

[4]  Karl Marx,et al.  Grundrisse : foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft) , 1971 .

[5]  Sara Ahmed Affective Economies , 2004 .

[6]  M. R. Matthews Mario Bunge: Physicist and Philosopher , 2003 .

[7]  J. Wajcman Feminist Theories of Technology , 2010 .

[8]  Christine Lohmeier,et al.  Work’s Intimacy , 2012, New Media Soc..

[9]  R. Filho,et al.  Security, territory, population (Lectures at the College de France) , 2011 .

[10]  M. Bunge Towards a Technoethics , 1975 .

[11]  Paul Kockelman The anthropology of an equation , 2013, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory.

[12]  N. Jude Race After Technology , 2021, Journal of Technology in Human Services.

[13]  Priti Ramamurthy Material Consumers, Fabricating Subjects: Perplexity, Global Connectivity Discourses, and Transnational Feminist Research , 2003 .

[14]  Britt Rusert Naturalizing Coercion: , 2019, Captivating Technology.

[15]  Julian R. A. Swinkels Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene , 2018 .

[16]  Christina Dunbar-Hester “Freedom from Jobs” or learning to love to labor? Diversity advocacy and working imaginaries in Open Technology Projects , 2016 .

[17]  L. F. R. Murillo,et al.  Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism , 2015 .

[18]  Prem Kumar Rajaram Homo Sacer , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

[19]  Frank A. Pasquale,et al.  [89WashLRev0001] The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions , 2014 .

[20]  Safiya Noble,et al.  Algorithms of Oppression , 2018 .

[21]  Tony Doyle,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[22]  J. Greenberg Disappointment , 2015, Bread and Tea.

[23]  Wendy Hui Kyong Chun,et al.  Programmed Visions: Software and Memory , 2011 .

[24]  H. Becker,et al.  the ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom , 1987 .

[25]  J. Zigon Disappointment: Toward a Critical Hermeneutics of Worldbuilding , 2017 .

[26]  Randy Martin An Empire of Indifference: American War and the Financial Logic of Risk Management , 2007 .

[27]  Kalindi Vora,et al.  뀀Ƞ ARTICLE Surrogate Humanity: Posthuman Networks and the (Racialized) Obsolescence of Labor , 2015 .

[28]  Sultan Doughan,et al.  Necropolitics , 2020, Political Theology.

[29]  An Xiao Mina,et al.  Batman, Pandaman and the Blind Man: A Case Study in Social Change Memes and Internet Censorship in China , 2014 .

[30]  Donna Haraway,et al.  Staying with the Trouble , 2020 .

[31]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Situational Awareness: Deadly Bioconvergence at the Boundaries of Bodies and Machines , 2015 .

[32]  Sareeta Amrute,et al.  Encoding Race, Encoding Class: Indian IT Workers in Berlin , 2016 .

[33]  D. Chakrabarty Universalism and Belonging in the Logic of Capital , 2000, Cosmopolitanism.

[34]  Alexander G. Weheliye Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human , 2014 .

[35]  Sareeta Amrute Press one for POTUS, two for the German chancellor , 2017, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory.

[36]  J. Butler Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? , 2009 .

[37]  A. Chan,et al.  Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism , 2016 .

[38]  Virginia E. Eubanks Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018 .

[39]  Kara Keeling,et al.  Queer OS , 2014 .

[40]  Hannah Lebovits Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018, Public Integrity.

[41]  Kathleen Stewart,et al.  Atmospheric Attunements , 2011 .

[42]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977-1978 , 2007 .

[43]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design , 2018 .

[44]  N. Tadiar Life-Times of Disposability within Global Neoliberalism , 2013 .

[45]  J. Zigon Attunement and Fidelity: Two Ontological Conditions for Morally Being-in-the-World , 2014 .

[46]  Kelsey Sherrod Michael,et al.  A prehistory of the cloud , 2017, New Media Soc..

[47]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[48]  Kalliopi Nikolopoulou,et al.  Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life , 1998 .

[49]  Zach Blas,et al.  QueerOS:: A User’s Manual , 2016 .