Identifying Commonalities and Divergences Between Technical Communication Scholarly and Trade Publications (1996–2017)

More than 20 years ago, Elizabeth O. Smith published her points of reference that documented the research trajectory of technical communication from 1988 to 1997. Her results indicated a focus on rhetorical analyses, a decrease in collaborative research, and a disproportionate representation of male authors. This study builds on these points with a quantitative content analysis of 1,271 articles that were published in five leading technical communication journals and Intercom, the trade magazine for the Society for Technical Communication, from 1996 to 2017. The results show that both the research journals and Intercom have pivoted to process-driven rather than product-driven content. The results also suggest that the primary topics of communication strategy and collaboration might be the most likely places to foster future industry–academic ties and that the greatest division between the two populations is the primary topic of rhetoric. This study offers an updated baseline for future investigations by offering an evaluation of disparate content foci between the publication types.

[1]  Guiseppe Getto,et al.  Content Strategy in Technical Communication , 2019 .

[2]  Z. Duan,et al.  Mapping international collaboration in tuberculosis research from 1998 to 2017 , 2019, Medicine.

[3]  Lisa Meloncon,et al.  Empirical Research in Technical and Professional Communication: A 5-Year Examination of Research Methods and a Call for Research Sustainability , 2019 .

[4]  David N. Dobrin,et al.  What’s Technical About Technical Writing? , 2019, New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication.

[5]  Rebekka Andersen,et al.  Increasing the Value and Accessibility of Academic Research: Perspectives from Industry , 2018, SIGDOC.

[6]  Tatiana Batova,et al.  Work Motivation in the Rhetoric of Component Content Management , 2018 .

[7]  J. Schreiber,et al.  An integrative literature review of project management in technical and professional communication , 2018 .

[8]  M. Kimball.  The Golden Age of Technical Communication , 2017 .

[9]  Chris Lam,et al.  Patterns of dissemination: Examining and documenting practitioner knowledge sharing practices on blogs , 2016 .

[10]  E. Brumberger,et al.  Technical communication as user experience in a broadening industry landscape , 2016 .

[11]  L. Melonçon,et al.  Addressing the Incommensurable , 2016 .

[12]  Dave Clark,et al.  Content Strategy: An Integrative Literature Review , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[13]  Bradley R. Barnes,et al.  A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals , 2016 .

[14]  Chris Lam,et al.  Where Did We Come From and Where Are We Going? Examining Authorship Characteristics in Technical Communication Research , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[15]  Matthew Kirschenbaum,et al.  Digital Scholarship and Digital Studies: The State of the Discipline , 2014 .

[16]  Frank R. Baumgartner,et al.  The state of the discipline: authorship, research designs, and citation patterns in studies of EU interest groups and lobbying , 2014 .

[17]  V. Bhatia,et al.  The Routledge handbook of language and professional communication , 2014 .

[18]  Chris Lam,et al.  An Overview of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Technical Communication Journals (1992–2011) , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  P. Merle,et al.  The Merits and Challenges of Using Business Press and Trade Journal Reports in Academic Research on Media Industries , 2013 .

[20]  Brian Traynor,et al.  Technical communication on life support: Content strategy and UX are the reclamation , 2013, IEEE International Professonal Communication 2013 Conference.

[21]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Finding Common Ground , 2012, Health promotion practice.

[22]  George F. Hayhoe,et al.  What Does the Transactions Publish? What do Transactions' Readers Want to Read? , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[23]  Carol M. Barnum,et al.  Overlap, Influence, Intertwining: The Interplay of UX and Technical Communication , 2011 .

[24]  J. Conklin,et al.  The Future of Technical Communication: How Innovation, Technology, Information Management, and Other Forces are Shaping the Future of the Profession BARBARA A . GIAMMONA , 2010 .

[25]  Sudhir Gupta.  A Farewell , 2010, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[26]  Teresa C. Kynell,et al.  The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing: The Emergence of Professional Identity , 2009 .

[27]  C. Brammer,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication: Looking to the Past to Discover the Present , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[28]  Sean L. Humpherys,et al.  A Scientometric Study of the Perceived Quality of Business and Technical Communication Journals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[29]  Lisa D. McNair,et al.  Teaching Technical Communication in an Era of Distributed Work: A Case Study of Collaboration Between U.S. and Swedish Students , 2007 .

[30]  W. Pfeiffer,et al.  Technical Communication , 2005 .

[31]  Ann M. Blakeslee,et al.  The State of Research in Technical Communication , 2004 .

[32]  Nick Hillman.  Editor’s Column , 2003, Journal of Student Financial Aid.

[33]  Association of Teachers of Technical Writing , 2002 .

[34]  Lee-Ann K Breuch,et al.  Thinking Critically about Technological Literacy: Developing a Framework to Guide Computer Pedagogy in Technical Communication , 2002 .

[35]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[36]  Elizabeth Overman Smith,et al.  Points of reference in technical communication scholarship , 2000 .

[37]  Elizabeth Overman Smith,et al.  Strength in the Technical Communication Journals and Diversity in the Serials Cited , 2000 .

[38]  J. Rabin,et al.  Public Administration-The State of the Discipline II: A Symposium: Shortfalls of Public Administration as Empirical Science , 1999 .

[39]  Patrick Moore,et al.  Instrumental Discourse is as Humanistic as Rhetoric , 1996 .

[40]  Lawrence R. Frey,et al.  The Naturalistic Paradigm , 1994 .

[41]  Charles H. Sides,et al.  COLLABORATION IN A HARDWARE TECHNICAL WRITING GROUP: A Real-world Laboratory , 1991 .

[42]  Jo Allen,et al.  The Case Against Defining Technical Writing , 1990 .

[43]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  Public Administration: The State of the Discipline , 1990 .

[44]  A. Cohen,et al.  Where Did We Come From and Where Are We Going , 1989 .

[45]  David D. Roberts,et al.  Readers' Comprehension Responses in Informative Discourse: Toward Connecting Reading and Writing in Technical Communication , 1989 .

[46]  David K. Farkas,et al.  The Concept of Consistency in Writing and Editing , 1985 .

[47]  R. E. Masse.  Theory and practice of editing processes in technical communication , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[48]  Jack Selzer,et al.  PLACE OF READABILITY FORMULAS IN TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION. , 1985 .

[49]  Richard David Ramsey,et al.  Grammatical Voice and Person in Technical Writing: Results of a Survey , 1980 .

[50]  Ryan J. Gallagher,et al.  Who Says What with Whom Using Bi-Spectral Clustering to Organize and Analyze Social Media Protest Networks , 2020 .

[51]  Erin Friess,et al.  Who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996–2013) , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC).

[52]  Roger Munger,et al.  Participating in a Technical Communication Internship , 2006 .

[53]  David F. Beer,et al.  Collaborative Writing in the Workplace , 2003 .

[54]  K. M. Kacmar,et al.  Organizational politics: The state of the field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research. , 1999 .

[55]  M. A. Siddiqui.  A Bibliometric Study of Authorship Characteristics in Four International Information Science Journals. , 1997 .

[56]  J. Watt,et al.  Research Methods for Communication Science , 1995 .

[57]  Saul Carliner,et al.  Finding a Common Ground: What STC Is, and Should Be, Doing to Advance Education in Information Design and Development. , 1995 .

[58]  P. Raptis.  Authorship Characteristics in Five International Library Science Journals , 1992 .

[59]  Jan H. Spyridakis,et al.  Writing for Human Performance: Relating Reading Research to Document Design. , 1992 .

[60]  Mary L Schuster.  Non-Rhetorical Elements of Layout and Design: Theory and Practice , 1989 .

[61]  Thomas Kent.  Genre Theory in the Area of Business Writing. , 1987 .

[62]  M. P. Jordan.  The Genre of Technical Description. , 1986 .

[63]  Candace Soderston,et al.  The Usability Edit: A New Level. , 1985 .