The WACMOS-ET project – Part 2: Evaluation of global terrestrial evaporation data sets

Abstract. The WAter Cycle Multi-mission Observation Strategy – EvapoTranspiration (WACMOS-ET) project aims to advance the development of land evaporation estimates on global and regional scales. Its main objective is the derivation, validation, and intercomparison of a group of existing evaporation retrieval algorithms driven by a common forcing data set. Three commonly used process-based evaporation methodologies are evaluated: the Penman–Monteith algorithm behind the official Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) evaporation product (PM-MOD), the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), and the Priestley–Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory model (PT-JPL). The resulting global spatiotemporal variability of evaporation, the closure of regional water budgets, and the discrete estimation of land evaporation components or sources (i.e. transpiration, interception loss, and direct soil evaporation) are investigated using river discharge data, independent global evaporation data sets and results from previous studies. In a companion article (Part 1), Michel et al. (2016) inspect the performance of these three models at local scales using measurements from eddy-covariance towers and include in the assessment the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) model. In agreement with Part 1, our results indicate that the Priestley and Taylor products (PT-JPL and GLEAM) perform best overall for most ecosystems and climate regimes. While all three evaporation products adequately represent the expected average geographical patterns and seasonality, there is a tendency in PM-MOD to underestimate the flux in the tropics and subtropics. Overall, results from GLEAM and PT-JPL appear more realistic when compared to surface water balances from 837 globally distributed catchments and to separate evaporation estimates from ERA-Interim and the model tree ensemble (MTE). Nonetheless, all products show large dissimilarities during conditions of water stress and drought and deficiencies in the way evaporation is partitioned into its different components. This observed inter-product variability, even when common forcing is used, suggests that caution is necessary in applying a single data set for large-scale studies in isolation. A general finding that different models perform better under different conditions highlights the potential for considering biome- or climate-specific composites of models. Nevertheless, the generation of a multi-product ensemble, with weighting based on validation analyses and uncertainty assessments, is proposed as the best way forward in our long-term goal to develop a robust observational benchmark data set of continental evaporation.

[1]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  New diagnostic estimates of variations in terrestrial water storage based on ERA‐Interim data , 2011 .

[2]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Observation of hydrological processes using remote sensing , 2011 .

[3]  S. Running,et al.  Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data , 2007 .

[4]  Leung Tsang,et al.  A prototype AMSR-E global snow area and snow depth algorithm , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,et al.  A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray-Darling Basin , 2012 .

[6]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Transpiration in the global water cycle , 2014 .

[7]  Franz Rubel,et al.  Correction of synoptic precipitation observations due to systematic measuring errors with special regard to precipitation phases , 2001 .

[8]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  The WACMOS-ET project – Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms , 2015 .

[9]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[10]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches , 2011 .

[11]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary , 2004 .

[12]  Y. Hong,et al.  Vegetation Greening and Climate Change Promote Multidecadal Rises of Global Land Evapotranspiration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  V. Kousky,et al.  Assessing objective techniques for gauge‐based analyses of global daily precipitation , 2008 .

[14]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[15]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  K. Oleson,et al.  GLACE : The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment . 2 . Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[18]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Partitioning evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems using time series of soil surface temperature , 2009 .

[19]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe , 2006, Nature.

[20]  U. Schneider,et al.  GPCC's new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[21]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis , 2013 .

[22]  P. Jarvis.  The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[23]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data , 2014 .

[24]  Yujie He,et al.  Response of evapotranspiration and water availability to the changing climate in Northern Eurasia , 2014, Climatic Change.

[25]  N. Verhoest,et al.  El Niño-La Niña cycle and recent trends in continental evaporation , 2014 .

[26]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability , 2011 .

[27]  S. Running,et al.  A continuous satellite‐derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983 to 2006 , 2010 .

[28]  Thomas Koop,et al.  Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications , 2005 .

[29]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[30]  Martin Wild,et al.  The Earth radiation balance as driver of the global hydrological cycle , 2010 .

[31]  D. Legates,et al.  Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge‐corrected, global precipitation , 1990 .

[32]  A. Sahoo,et al.  Reconciling the global terrestrial water budget using satellite remote sensing , 2011 .

[33]  Z. Su.  The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[34]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[35]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Evaporation from Amazonian rainforest , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[36]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[37]  J. Susskind,et al.  Global Precipitation at One-Degree Daily Resolution from Multisatellite Observations , 2001 .

[38]  Andrej Varlagin,et al.  Rainfall interception and the coupled surface water and energy balance , 2015 .

[39]  M. Budyko,et al.  Climate and life , 1975 .

[40]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[41]  Steven P. Loheide,et al.  Monitoring and modeling water‐vegetation interactions in groundwater‐dependent ecosystems , 2012 .

[42]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Trend-preserving blending of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals , 2012 .

[43]  J. Gash.  An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests , 1979 .

[44]  W. Bouten,et al.  Gross rainfall and its partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and evaporation of intercepted water in four forest ecosystems in western Amazonia , 2000 .

[45]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Earth observation Water Cycle Multi-Mission Observation Strategy (WACMOS) , 2010 .

[46]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Multi‐model, multi‐sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends , 2011 .

[47]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[48]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[49]  C. Adam Schlosser,et al.  Assessing Evapotranspiration Estimates from the Second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) Simulations , 2010 .

[50]  R. Jeu,et al.  Global canopy interception from satellite observations , 2010 .

[51]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Global long‐term passive microwave satellite‐based retrievals of vegetation optical depth , 2011 .

[52]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data , 2015 .

[53]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Xi Chen,et al.  Groundwater influences on soil moisture and surface evaporation , 2004 .

[55]  Steven W. Running,et al.  MODIS Global Terrestrial Evapotranspiration (ET) Product (NASA MOD16A2/A3) Collection 5. NASA Headquarters , 2013 .

[56]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models , 2012 .

[57]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle – Part 1: Temporal characteristics over land , 2014 .

[58]  H. Douville,et al.  Anthropogenic influence on multidecadal changes in reconstructed global evapotranspiration , 2012 .

[59]  Zhuguo Ma,et al.  Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China , 2014 .

[60]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  Evapotranspiration amplifies European summer drought , 2013 .

[61]  D. Lawrence,et al.  GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview , 2006 .

[62]  D. Fitzjarrald,et al.  Detecting rainfall interception in an Amazonian rain forest with eddy flux measurements. , 2009 .

[63]  Marc B. Parlange,et al.  An advection aridity evaporation model , 1992 .

[64]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Magnitude and variability of land evaporation and its components at the global scale , 2011 .

[65]  B. Timbal,et al.  The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society , 2013 .

[66]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[67]  T. Holmes,et al.  Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations , 2010 .

[68]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[69]  A. Baumgartner,et al.  The world water balance: Mean annual global, continental and maritime precipitation, evaporation and run-off , 1975 .

[70]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and atmospheric heat accumulation , 2014 .

[71]  Stephen P. Good,et al.  Global synthesis of vegetation control on evapotranspiration partitioning , 2014 .

[72]  A. Dolman,et al.  Fifty years since Monteith's 1965 seminal paper: the emergence of global ecohydrology , 2014 .

[73]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Reconciling spatial and temporal soil moisture effects on afternoon rainfall , 2015, Nature Communications.

[74]  C. R. Lloyd,et al.  The measurement and modelling of rainfall interception by Amazonian rain forest , 1988 .

[75]  E. Wood,et al.  Little change in global drought over the past 60 years , 2012, Nature.

[76]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates , 2011 .

[77]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Climate extremes and the carbon cycle , 2013, Nature.

[78]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data , 2008 .

[79]  A. Meesters,et al.  Wet canopy evaporation from a Puerto Rican lower montane rain forest: the importance of realistically estimated aerodynamic conductance , 2012 .

[80]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[81]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Creating consistent datasets by combining remotely-sensed data and land surface model estimates through Bayesian uncertainty post-processing: The case of Land Surface Temperature from HIRS , 2015 .

[82]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Improving terrestrial evaporation estimates over continental Australia through assimilation of SMOS soil moisture , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[83]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[84]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment , 1996 .

[85]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[86]  S. J. Birks,et al.  Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration , 2013, Nature.

[87]  J. Tomasella,et al.  Interception water-partitioning dynamics for a pristine rainforest in Central Amazonia: Marked differences between normal and dry years. , 2007 .