Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework

Abstract A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers’ lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media.

[1]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  Investigation and Treatment of Missing Item Scores in Test and Questionnaire Data , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study , 2006, Appetite.

[3]  Antoine Flahault,et al.  Risk Perception of the “Mad Cow Disease” in France: Determinants and Consequences , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[5]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[6]  A. Nicol,et al.  A Tale of Two Food Risks: BSE and Farmed Salmon in Canada , 2006 .

[7]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review , 1996 .

[8]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[9]  C. Bruhn Explaining the concept of health risk versus hazards to consumers , 2005 .

[10]  John T Lang,et al.  Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  U. Kjærnes Trust and Distrust: Cognitive Decisions or Social Relations? , 2006 .

[12]  B. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[13]  L. Berg Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: a comparative study of consumers' evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway , 2004, Appetite.

[14]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[15]  K. Grunert Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice , 2002 .

[16]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[18]  G. Rowe,et al.  Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden , 2000, Public understanding of science.

[19]  Robert A Frank,et al.  Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis , 2003, Appetite.

[20]  L. Frewer The public and effective risk communication. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[21]  L. Frewer,et al.  How trust in institutions and organizations builds general consumer confidence in the safety of food: A decomposition of effects , 2008, Appetite.

[22]  Brian Salter,et al.  Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: The case of BSE , 2002 .

[23]  Susan Miles,et al.  Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards , 2001 .

[24]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  R. Löfstedt,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 1999 .

[26]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust , 1999 .

[27]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[28]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  Roger E. Kasperson,et al.  Communicating Risks to the Public , 1991 .

[30]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[31]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  T J Meyer,et al.  Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. , 1990, Behaviour research and therapy.

[33]  P. Washer Representations of mad cow disease. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[34]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis , 2006 .

[35]  Spencer Henson,et al.  Consumer Assessment of the Safety of Beef at the Point of Purchase: A Pan-European Study , 2008 .

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[37]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  L. Bredahl Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey , 2001 .

[39]  Matthew T.G. Meulenberg,et al.  A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease , 2002 .

[40]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Evaluation of publicity measures relating to the EU beef labelling system in Belgium , 2002 .

[41]  L. Kubzansky,et al.  Optimism and Pessimism in the Context of Health: Bipolar Opposites or Separate Constructs? , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[42]  L J Frewer,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Food Risk Management Quality in Europe , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  M. Conner,et al.  Ambivalence and Attitudes , 2002 .

[45]  J. Eiser,et al.  Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies , 2002 .

[46]  Reint Jan Renes,et al.  Understanding Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food: Its Two‐Dimensional Structure and Determinants , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  E. Millstone,et al.  Health, Hazards and Public Debate: Lessons for Risk Communication from the BSE/CJD Saga , 2006 .

[48]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[49]  B. Halkier,et al.  Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway , 2005 .

[50]  K. Grunert,et al.  Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe , 2004, Appetite.

[51]  Ivo van der Lans,et al.  Consumer responses to communication about food risk management , 2008, Appetite.

[52]  Bette Hileman,et al.  MAD COW DISEASE , 2004 .

[53]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[54]  D. Marshall,et al.  Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice and other constructs , 2004 .

[55]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey , 1999 .

[56]  W. Verbeke Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis , 2001 .

[57]  O. Bergh,et al.  Food-related personality traits, food choice motives and food intake: Mediator and moderator relationships , 2005 .

[58]  James A. Young,et al.  How now, mad‐cow? Consumer confidence and source credibility during the 1996 BSE scare , 1999 .

[59]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[60]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[61]  A. Pearman,et al.  Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom , 2002, Appetite.

[62]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[63]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  Timothy A Brown,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? , 2003, Behaviour research and therapy.