Patent pool under endogenous technology choice

It is generally believed that patent pools by complementary input suppliers make the consumers, final goods producers and the society better off by reducing the complements problem. We show that this may not be the case under endogenous technology choice. Although a patent pool reduces input price, it may make the consumers and the society worse off by reducing innovation. We also show that a patent pool makes the input suppliers better off, but it may not make all final goods producers better off compared with non-cooperation between the input suppliers.

[1]  M. Katz,et al.  Efficient division of profits from complementary innovations , 2011 .

[2]  S. Marjit,et al.  International Outsourcing and R&D: Long-Run Implications for Consumers , 2008 .

[3]  Klaus M. Schmidt Complementary Patents and Market Structure , 2008 .

[4]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules , 2008 .

[5]  Anne Layne-Farrar,et al.  To Join or Not to Join: Examining Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing Rules , 2006 .

[6]  Sung-Hwan Kim,et al.  Vertical Structure and Patent Pools , 2004 .

[7]  Reiko Aoki,et al.  The Consortium Standard and Patent Pools , 2004 .

[8]  A. Kato Patent pool enhances market competition , 2004 .

[9]  J. Choi,et al.  Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing in the Shadow of Patent Litigation , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  A. Mukherjee Does society prefer small innovation , 2003 .

[11]  E. Pennings,et al.  Imitation, Patent Protection and Welfare , 2003 .

[12]  J. Tirole,et al.  Efficient Patent Pools , 2002 .

[13]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[14]  A. Mattoo,et al.  Mode of Foreign Entry, Technology Transfer, and FDI Policy , 2001 .

[15]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[16]  Parabal Ray Chaudhuri,et al.  Technological asymmetry and joint product development , 1995 .

[17]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Patent Policy and Costly Imitation , 1992 .

[18]  Debraj Ray,et al.  On the competitive pressure created by the diffusion of innovations , 1991 .

[19]  G. Priest Cartels and Patent License Arrangements , 1977, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[20]  Richard J. Gilbert,et al.  Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution , 2004 .

[21]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools , 1999 .