Suppression of Surface-Related Loss in a Gated Semiconductor Microcavity

We present a surface passivation method that reduces surface-related losses by almost two orders of magnitude in a highly miniaturized GaAs open microcavity. The microcavity consists of a curved dielectric distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) with radius $\sim 10$ $\mu$m paired with a GaAs-based heterostructure. The heterostructure consists of a semiconductor DBR followed by an n-i-p diode with a layer of quantum dots in the intrinsic region. Free-carrier absorption in the highly doped n- and p-layers is minimized by positioning them close to a node of the vacuum electromagnetic-field. The surface, however, resides at an anti-node of the vacuum field and results in significant loss. These losses are much reduced by surface passivation. The strong dependence on wavelength implies that the surface passivation works by reducing the surface electric field, thereby reducing below-bandgap absorption via the Franz-Keldysh effect. These results are important in other nano-photonic devices which rely on a GaAs-vacuum interface to confine the electromagnetic field.

[1]  A. Wieck,et al.  A bright and fast source of coherent single photons , 2020, Nature Nanotechnology.

[2]  Y. Ota,et al.  Surface-passivated high-Q GaAs photonic crystal nanocavity with quantum dots , 2019, APL Photonics.

[3]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  A gated quantum dot strongly coupled to an optical microcavity , 2019, Nature.

[4]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  A gated quantum dot far in the strong-coupling regime of cavity-QED at optical frequencies , 2018, 1812.08662.

[5]  Marcelo Davanco,et al.  Single self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots in photonic nanostructures: The role of nanofabrication. , 2018, Physical review applied.

[6]  P. Senellart,et al.  High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[7]  Sae Woo Nam,et al.  Single self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots in photonic nanostructures: The role of nanofabrication. , 2017, Physical review applied.

[8]  Bruno Gérard,et al.  Surface-enhanced gallium arsenide photonic resonator with quality factor of 6 × 10 6 , 2017 .

[9]  I. E. Cortes-Mestizo,et al.  Photoreflectance and Raman Study of Surface Electric States on AlGaAs/GaAs Heterostructures , 2016 .

[10]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[11]  I. Sagnes,et al.  Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[12]  A. V. Kuhlmann,et al.  Towards high-cooperativity strong coupling of a quantum-dot in a tunable microcavity: The role of emitter broadening , 2016, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[13]  Pascal Besson,et al.  Chemical Treatments for Native Oxides Removal of GaAs Wafers , 2015 .

[14]  J. Robertson,et al.  Defect state passivation at III-V oxide interfaces for complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor devices , 2015 .

[15]  R. Warburton,et al.  A small mode volume tunable microcavity: Development and characterization , 2014, 1408.1357.

[16]  A. Wieck,et al.  Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device , 2013, Nature Physics.

[17]  P. Petroff,et al.  A tunable microcavity , 2011, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[18]  D. Hunger,et al.  Laser micro-fabrication of concave, low-roughness features in silica , 2011, 1109.5047.

[19]  P. Ye,et al.  Simplified Surface Preparation for GaAs Passivation Using Atomic Layer-Deposited High- $\kappa$ Dielectrics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[20]  G. Rupper,et al.  Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity , 2004, Nature.

[21]  V. Kulakovskii,et al.  Strong coupling in a single quantum dot–semiconductor microcavity system , 2004, Nature.

[22]  M. Loupias,et al.  The VIRGO large mirrors: a challenge for low loss coatings , 2004 .

[23]  C K Carniglia,et al.  Single-layer model for surface roughness. , 2002, Applied optics.

[24]  K. Karrai,et al.  Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring , 2000, Nature.

[25]  J. H. Davies,et al.  The physics of low-dimensional semiconductors , 1997 .

[26]  G. Döhler,et al.  k.p theory of the Franz-Keldysh effect , 1997 .

[27]  N. Linder,et al.  Polarization-insensitive high-contrast GaAs/AlGaAs waveguide modulator based on the Franz-Keldysh effect , 1993, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[28]  J. Bennett,et al.  Recent developments in surface roughness characterization , 1992 .

[29]  Ohno.  Sulfur passivation of GaAs surfaces. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[30]  Eli Yablonovitch,et al.  Nearly ideal electronic properties of sulfide coated GaAs surfaces , 1987 .

[31]  C. Demanet,et al.  A multilayer model for GaAs oxides formed at room temperature in air as deduced from an XPS analysis , 1985 .

[32]  H. C. Casey,et al.  Concentration dependence of the absorption coefficient for n− and p−type GaAs between 1.3 and 1.6 eV , 1975 .

[33]  D. Aspnes.  Electric-Field Effects on Optical Absorption near Thresholds in Solids , 1966 .

[34]  W. Franz.  Einfluß eines elektrischen Feldes auf eine optische Absorptionskante , 1958 .