Creating Economic and Environmental Value through Industrial Symbiosis

Although relatively under-studied, industrial symbiosis may be a particularly valuable type of interfirm action for creating value under economic constraints, such as increased environmental regulations, because it involves firms collaborating to find economical ways to “do more with less”, by taking wastes and excess resources from one firm and processing them into valuable inputs for another. To better understand its value-creating potential, we analyzed firm- and policy-level environmental and economic outcomes for 313 industrial symbiosis exchanges across the United Kingdom, during a period of increasing environmental taxation and regulation. We found that, 1) exchanges involving larger volumes of material resources are more likely to create firm- and policy-level value; 2) firms with prior industrial symbiosis experience are more likely to create firm-level value; and, 3) exchanges involving dedicated waste firms are more likely to create policy-level value, although somewhat less likely to create firm-level value. Extending prior work on intra-firm action research, we show how firms can also create value through interfirm industrial symbiosis collaborations in response to regulatory constraints. We develop a deeper understanding of the types of outcomes likely to occur from industrial symbiosis exchanges, and detail firm- and policy-level implications and questions for future research.

[1]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Regulatory Stringency, Green Production Offsets and Organizations' Financial Performance , 2009 .

[2]  Judy Kincaid,et al.  Industrial Ecosystem Development at the Metropolitan Level , 2001 .

[3]  Dror Etzion,et al.  Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review , 2007 .

[4]  Dick van Beers,et al.  Capturing Regional Synergies in the Kwinana Industrial Area , 2006 .

[5]  Hans Bruyninckx,et al.  Upscaling transition governance. An exploratory analysis of the Roadmap to a Resource‐Efficient Europe , 2012 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation , 2013, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  Murat Mirata,et al.  Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges , 2004 .

[8]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  The Social Embeddedness of Industrial Ecology , 2011 .

[9]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[10]  G. Christainsen,et al.  The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth , 1981 .

[11]  Renato J. Orsato Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does it Pay to Be Green? , 2006 .

[12]  Yong Geng,et al.  Scavengers and decomposers in an eco-industrial park , 2002 .

[13]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  A Handbook of Industrial Ecology , 2002 .

[14]  M. Peeters,et al.  EU Environmental Legislation , 2014 .

[15]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg , 1997 .

[16]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from the United Kingdom's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme , 2011 .

[17]  P. Laybourn,et al.  Redefining Industrial Symbiosis , 2012 .

[18]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Analyzing the Environmental Benefits of Industrial Symbiosis , 2011 .

[19]  N. Jacobsen Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects , 2006 .

[20]  Jennifer Howard-Grenville,et al.  Facilitating regional industrial symbiosis: Network growth in the UK’s National Industrial Symbiosis Programme , 2009 .

[21]  Dayna Simpson,et al.  Use of supply relationships to recycle secondary materials , 2010 .

[22]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments: The role of business uncertainty , 2007 .

[23]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[24]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial symbiosis: the legacy of Kalundborg , 2002 .

[25]  Livio D. DeSimone,et al.  Eco‐Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[26]  Michael L. Barnett Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[27]  Raymond L. Paquin,et al.  The Engagement of Firms in Environmental Collaborations , 2014 .

[28]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[29]  M. Chertow,et al.  Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Leo Baas,et al.  Cleaner production and industrial ecosystems, a Dutch experience , 1998 .

[31]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Eco‐efficiency: Philosophy, Theory, and Tools , 2005 .

[32]  M. Leach,et al.  Reinterpreting Industrial Ecology , 2011 .

[33]  D. V. Beers,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone , 2007 .

[34]  Fredrik von Malmborg,et al.  Networking for knowledge transfer: towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management , 2004 .

[35]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[36]  O. Ziegler Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment , 2013 .

[37]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[38]  G. Parkinson,et al.  Reducing wastes can be cost-effective , 1990 .

[39]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[40]  Suzanne G. Tilleman,et al.  Is There Cash in That Trash? , 2014 .

[41]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  The Evolution of Facilitated Industrial Symbiosis , 2012 .

[42]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[43]  M. Porter,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness , 1998 .

[44]  Catherine A. Hardy,et al.  Industrial Ecosystems as Food Webs , 2002 .

[45]  Han Shi,et al.  Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China , 2010 .

[46]  W. Ashton,et al.  Assessing the “Short Mental Distance” in Eco‐Industrial Networks , 2012 .

[47]  Alfred Marshall,et al.  Industry and Trade; a Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization; and of Their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations , 2011 .

[48]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[50]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Industrial ecology and eco‐industrial development: A potential paradigm for local and regional development? , 2005 .

[51]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Municipalities and industrial ecology: reconsidering municipal environmental management , 2001 .

[52]  T. Graedel Industrial Ecology , 1995 .

[53]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[54]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application , 2005 .

[55]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[56]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis in China: A Case Study of the Guitang Group , 2007 .

[57]  David Gibbs,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis and Eco‐Industrial Development: An Introduction , 2008 .

[58]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[59]  P. Laybourn,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis in European Policy , 2012 .

[60]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[61]  Jennifer Howard-Grenville,et al.  Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration , 2013 .

[62]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .