Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model.

PURPOSE To (a) validate a breast magnetic resonance (MR) interpretation model, (b) expand the tree-shaped prediction model to increase specificity without decreasing sensitivity, and (c) reevaluate the model's diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred sixty-two new patients with palpable or mammographic abnormalities underwent MR imaging, and pathologic evaluation was performed. They were entered prospectively into the model, which yielded 454 patients in the construction (training) and validation (test) phases. Predictive values for previously published terminal nodes or branch points of the model were compared between the training and test data sets. Ductal enhancement morphology, regional enhancement micronodularity, regional enhancement degree, and focal mass T2 signal intensity were evaluated for model expansion. Diagnostic performance characteristics of the model were recalculated. RESULTS For previously published nodes, absence of a lesion visible at MR imaging, smooth masses, lobulated masses with nonenhancing internal septations, and lobulated masses with minimal or no enhancement had negative predictive values (NPVs) for malignancy similar in both data sets (96% vs 99%, 100% vs 93%, 100% vs 98%, and 100% vs 100%). Irregular masses with internal septations (100% vs 0%) and spiculated masses with no or minimal enhancement (100% vs 50%) did not. Nonseptated enhancing lobulated masses with low T2 signal intensity were added as a benign terminal node (NPV, 100%). Mild regional enhancement (NPV, 92%) was added but not considered a terminal node. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the expanded model were 96%, 80%, 96%, 78%, and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSION Additional investigation yielded a slightly modified model, but the diagnostic performance characteristics remain high, similar to those originally published.

[1]  M. Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  M D Schnall,et al.  Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  L D Buadu,et al.  Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  P J Drew,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[7]  J H Simon,et al.  Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1996, Radiology.

[9]  M D Schnall,et al.  Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  Jerome H. Friedman,et al.  A Recursive Partitioning Decision Rule for Nonparametric Classification , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[11]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  L. Bassett,et al.  Multifeature analysis of Gd‐enhanced MR images of breast lesions , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[15]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  M D Schnall,et al.  Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M D Schnall,et al.  Multicoil array for high resolution imaging of the breast , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.