Bacterial Species Determination from DNA-DNA Hybridization by Using Genome Fragments and DNA Microarrays

ABSTRACT Whole genomic DNA-DNA hybridization has been a cornerstone of bacterial species determination but is not widely used because it is not easily implemented. We have developed a method based on random genome fragments and DNA microarray technology that overcomes the disadvantages of whole-genome DNA-DNA hybridization. Reference genomes of four fluorescent Pseudomonas species were fragmented, and 60 to 96 genome fragments of approximately 1 kb from each strain were spotted on microarrays. Genomes from 12 well-characterized fluorescent Pseudomonas strains were labeled with Cy dyes and hybridized to the arrays. Cluster analysis of the hybridization profiles revealed taxonomic relationships between bacterial strains tested at species to strain level resolution, suggesting that this approach is useful for the identification of bacteria as well as determining the genetic distance among bacteria. Since arrays can contain thousands of DNA spots, a single array has the potential for broad identification capacity. In addition, the method does not require laborious cross-hybridizations and can provide an open database of hybridization profiles, avoiding the limitations of traditional DNA-DNA hybridization.

[1]  Y. Peer,et al.  The Determination and Comparison of the 16S rRNA Gene Sequences of Species of the Genus Pseudomonas (sensu stricto and Estimation of the Natural Intrageneric Relationships , 1996 .

[2]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Biogeography and Degree of Endemicity of Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains in Soil , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  R. Sokal,et al.  Principles of numerical taxonomy , 1965 .

[4]  Erko Stackebrandt,et al.  Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology , 1994 .

[5]  Lawrence G. Wayne,et al.  International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology: Announcement of the Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics , 1988 .

[6]  D. Roth,et al.  Nucleic acid probes for identification of phytobacteria : identification of genus-specific 16s rRNA sequences , 1990 .

[7]  W. Whitman,et al.  Phylogeny and taxonomy of mesophilic Methanococcus spp. and comparison of rRNA, DNA hybridization, and phenotypic methods. , 1996, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[8]  D. Sands,et al.  Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Pseudomonads , 1970, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  M. Doudoroff,et al.  The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study. , 1966, Journal of general microbiology.

[10]  D. Stahl,et al.  Diversity and origin of Desulfovibrio species: phylogenetic definition of a family , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  B. Manning,et al.  Genomic complexity and plasticity of Burkholderia cepacia. , 1996, FEMS microbiology letters.

[12]  S. Goodison,et al.  16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  M. Collins,et al.  Phylogenetic interrelationships of members of the genera Aeromonas and Plesiomonas as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing: lack of congruence with results of DNA-DNA hybridizations. , 1992, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[14]  E. Lander Array of hope , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[15]  M. Doudoroff,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homologies Among Some Pseudomonas Species , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  C. Woese,et al.  Bacterial evolution , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[17]  E. C. Pielou The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections , 1966 .

[18]  I. Misaghi,et al.  Nutritional and biochemical comparisons of plant-pathogenic and saprophytic fluorescent pseudomonads. , 1969, Phytopathology.

[19]  G. Fox,et al.  How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. , 1992, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[20]  Jan LW Rademaker,et al.  Comparison of AFLP and rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting with DNA-DNA homology studies: Xanthomonas as a model system. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[21]  M. Doudoroff,et al.  Nucleic Acid Homologies in the Genus Pseudomonas , 1973 .

[22]  R. G. Grogan,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology Groups Among Phytopathogenic Pseudomonas Species , 1973 .