Delay and Interval Effects with Subadditive Discounting Functions

Delay effect appears as an anomaly of the traditional discounted utility model according to which a decrease of the discount rate is performed as waiting time increases. But, in this description, it is not clear if the benchmark (that is to say, the reference instant in the assessment process) or the discounted amount availability is fixed or variable. In this way, other authors use the term common difference effect (and immediacy effect, when the first outcome is available immediately) and this expression at least does implies a variable discounted amount availability. Read introduces another different effect, the interval effect: longer intervals lead to smaller values of the discount rate r. Taking into account the parameter δ (geometric mean of the discount factor), the interval effect implies larger values of δ. In this paper we try to clarify the concepts of delay and interval effect and we deduce some relationships between these concepts and certain subadditive discounting functions.

[1]  H. Rachlin Judgment, Decision, and Choice: A Cognitive/Behavioral Synthesis , 1989 .

[2]  G. Ainslie Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person , 1992 .

[3]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[4]  S. C. Rambaud,et al.  An Analysis of the Anomalies in Traditional Discounting Models , 2004 .

[5]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[6]  M. Coller,et al.  Eliciting Individual Discount Rates , 1999 .

[7]  D. Read Is Time-Discounting Hyperbolic or Subadditive? , 2001 .

[8]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[9]  John G. Lynch,et al.  The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones? , 2005 .

[10]  G. Chapman Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives of Intertemporal Choice , 2003 .

[12]  Salvador Cruz Rambaud,et al.  Decomposable Financial Laws and Profitability , 1998, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Is the evidence for hyperbolic discounting in humans just an experimental artefact? , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  J. E. Mazur Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. , 1984 .

[15]  M. Commons The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value , 2013 .

[16]  Daniel Read,et al.  Discounting by Intervals: A Generalized Model of Intertemporal Choice , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  R. Thaler Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .