A rule-based expert system for chemical prioritization using effects-based chemical categories$

A rule-based expert system (ES) was developed to predict chemical binding to the estrogen receptor (ER) patterned on the research approaches championed by Gilman Veith to whom this article and journal issue are dedicated. The ERES was built to be mechanistically transparent and meet the needs of a specific application, i.e. predict for all chemicals within two well-defined inventories (industrial chemicals used as pesticide inerts and antimicrobial pesticides). These chemicals all lack structural features associated with high affinity binders and thus any binding should be low affinity. Similar to the high-quality fathead minnow database upon which Veith QSARs were built, the ERES was derived from what has been termed gold standard data, systematically collected in assays optimized to detect even low affinity binding and maximizing confidence in the negatives determinations. The resultant logic-based decision tree ERES, determined to be a robust model, contains seven major nodes with multiple effects-based chemicals categories within each. Predicted results are presented in the context of empirical data within local chemical structural groups facilitating informed decision-making. Even using optimized detection assays, the ERES applied to two inventories of >600 chemicals resulted in only ~5% of the chemicals predicted to bind ER.

[1]  P. Bjerregaard,et al.  Estrogenicity of butylparaben in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss exposed via food and water. , 2005, Aquatic toxicology.

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  M. Matsuishi,et al.  Purification and properties of cysteine proteinase inhibitors from rabbit skeletal muscle. , 2003, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[4]  Gerald T Ankley,et al.  Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure‐activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  Effect of substituent size and dimensionality on potency of phenolic xenoestrogens evaluated with a recombinant yeast assay , 2000 .

[6]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Structural Features of Alkylphenolic Chemicals Associated with Estrogenic Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Tala R Henry,et al.  Use of trout liver slices to enhance mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding for cost-effective prioritization of chemicals within large inventories. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  T. Koda,et al.  Estrogenic activity of 37 components of commercial sunscreen lotions evaluated by in vitro assays. , 2005, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[9]  J. Cravedi,et al.  Two complementary bioassays for screening the estrogenic potency of xenobiotics: recombinant yeast for trout estrogen receptor and trout hepatocyte cultures. , 1997, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[10]  J. Ashby,et al.  Obstacles to the prediction of estrogenicity from chemical structure: assay-mediated metabolic transformation and the apparent promiscuous nature of the estrogen receptor. , 2000, Biochemical pharmacology.

[11]  M. W. Hornung,et al.  Effects-based chemical category approach for prioritization of low affinity estrogenic chemicals$ , 2014, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[12]  P. Bjerregaard,et al.  Estrogenic effect of propylparaben (propylhydroxybenzoate) in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss after exposure via food and water. , 2003, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[13]  T. Zacharewski,et al.  Differential estrogen receptor binding of estrogenic substances: a species comparison , 2000, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[14]  Gilman D. Veith,et al.  QSAR prioritization of chemical inventories for endocrine disruptor testing , 2003 .

[15]  R Serafimova,et al.  QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[16]  Minne B Heringa,et al.  Toward more useful in vitro toxicity data with measured free concentrations. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Elisa Michelini,et al.  Bioluminescent yeast assays for detecting estrogenic and androgenic activity in different matrices. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[18]  R. Kiyama,et al.  Expression profiling of estrogen-responsive genes in breast cancer cells treated with alkylphenols, chlorinated phenols, parabens, or bis- and benzoylphenols for evaluation of estrogenic activity. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[19]  B. Wheals,et al.  Estrogenic activity of phenolic additives determined by an in vitro yeast bioassay. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  H Fang,et al.  The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[21]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  The nature of the ligand-binding pocket of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: The search for subtype-selective ligands and implications for the prediction of estrogenic activity , 2003 .

[22]  Gilman D Veith,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[23]  Weida Tong,et al.  Decision Forest: Combining the Predictions of Multiple Independent Decision Tree Models , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[24]  H Aladjov,et al.  Strategic selection of chemicals for testing. Part I. Functionalities and performance of basic selection methods , 2009, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[25]  J Ashby,et al.  Some alkyl hydroxy benzoate preservatives (parabens) are estrogenic. , 1998, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[26]  Catherine Mahony,et al.  Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[27]  Y. Shimohigashi,et al.  Structural requirements of para-alkylphenols to bind to estrogen receptor. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[28]  M. Cronin,et al.  Estrogenicity and acute toxicity of selected anilines using a recombinant yeast assay. , 2003, Chemosphere.