History Matching Using Probabilistic Approach in a Distributed Computing Environment

The focus of the paper is to present a novel methodology for delineating multiple reservoir domains, for the purpose of history matching in a distributed computing environment. A fully probabilistic approach to perturb permeability within the delineated zones is implemented. The combination of robust schemes for identifying reservoir zones and distributed computing significantly increase the accuracy and efficiency of the probabilistic approach. The information pertaining to the permeability variations in the reservoir that is contained in dynamic data is calibrated in terms of a deformation parameter rD. This information is merged with the prior geologic information in order to generate permeability models consistent with the observed dynamic data as well as the prior geology. The relationship between dynamic response data and reservoir attributes may vary in different regions of the reservoir due to spatial variations in reservoir attributes, well configuration, flow constrains etc. The probabilistic approach then has to account for multiple rD values in different regions of the reservoir. In order to delineate reservoir domains that can be characterized with different rD parameters, principal component analysis (PCA) of the Hessian matrix has been done. The Hessian matrix summarizes the sensitivity of the objective function at a given step of the history matching to model parameters. The eigenvectors obtained during the PCA are suitably scaled and appropriate grid block volume cut-offs are defined such that the resultant domains are neither too large (which increases interactions between domains) nor too small (implying ineffective history matching).

[1]  A. Journel Combining Knowledge from Diverse Sources: An Alternative to Traditional Data Independence Hypotheses , 2002 .

[2]  Jorge L. Landa,et al.  A Methodology for History Matching and the Assessment of Uncertainties Associated with Flow Prediction , 2003 .

[3]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Applied Factor Analysis in the Natural Sciences. , 1997 .

[4]  P. A. Swaby,et al.  Combining Geostatistical Modelling With Gradient Information for History Matching: The Pilot Point Method , 1997 .

[5]  Ahmed Ouenes,et al.  Parallel Reservoir Automatic History Matching Using a Network of Workstations and PVM , 1995 .

[6]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[7]  R. M. Srivastava Reservoir Characterization With Probability Field Simulation , 1993 .

[8]  Shah Shah,et al.  Error Analysis in History Matching: The Optimum Level of Parameterization , 1978 .

[9]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  History Matching of Three-Phase Flow Production Data , 2003 .

[10]  P. C. Shah,et al.  Reservoir History Matching by Bayesian Estimation , 1976 .

[11]  T. Kashib,et al.  Iterative Updating of Reservoir Models Constrained to Dynamic Data , 2002 .

[12]  John Killough,et al.  Static and Dynamic Load-Balancing Strategies for Parallel Reservoir Simulation , 1995 .

[13]  Steven L. Bryant,et al.  Integrating Dynamic Data in Reservoir Models Using a Parallel Computational Approach , 2004 .

[14]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[15]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysical Properties Spatial Distributions, and Flow Performance Forecasts to Geostatistical Parameters Using Derivative Coefficients , 2002 .

[16]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Use of External Parallelization to Improve History Matching , 1997 .

[17]  L. Y. Hu,et al.  Production Data Integration Using a Gradual Deformation Approach: Application to an Oil Field (Offshore Brazil) , 2000 .

[18]  John Killough Is Parallel Computing Ready for Reservoir Simulation? A Critical Analysis of the State of the Art , 1993 .

[19]  R. W. Schulze-Riegert,et al.  Combined Global and Local Optimization Techniques Applied to History Matching , 2003 .

[20]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  Reservoir Simulation on a Hypercube , 1990 .

[21]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[22]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[23]  Olivier Gosselin,et al.  Integrated History-Matching of Production and 4D Seismic Data , 2001 .

[24]  Robert Bissell,et al.  Calculating Optimal Parameters for History Matching , 1994 .

[25]  P. Jacquard,et al.  Permeability Distribution From Field Pressure Data , 1965 .

[26]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  History Matching of the PUNQ-S3 Reservoir Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2005 .

[27]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Integration of production data into reservoir models , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[28]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Rapid History Matching Using a Generalized Travel-Time Inversion Method , 2002 .

[29]  A. T. Watson,et al.  Automatic History Matching With Variable-Metric Methods , 1988 .

[30]  Jonathan Carter,et al.  Improved Reservoir Characterization through Evolutionary Computation , 2000 .