Picture-naming in aphasia

The distribution of picture-naming errors for Broca's aphasics (n = 9), Wernicke's aphasics (n = 9), conduction aphasics (n = 9), frontal anomics (n = 7), and posterior anomics (n = 9) was examined to determine the diagnostic power of error types in picture-naming. Negated responses were associated with Broca's aphasia, whole-part errors ("hose" for nozzle) were associated with frontal anomia, and poor phonemic cuing was associated with Wernicke's aphasia. In addition, the relative distribution of the three most prominent naming errors-phonemic errors, semantic errors, and multiword circumlocutions-tended to distinguish the two anomic subgroups from the other aphasia subgroups. Anomic aphasics produced the fewest phonemic errors and the most multiword circumlocutions; this pattern suggests minimal word-production difficulty in anomic aphasia relative to the other aphasia syndromes. Despite such group differences, the overall picture indicates that there is considerable similarity among aphasia syndromes in terms of picture-naming behavior.

[1]  D. Benson,et al.  Neurologic Correlates of Anomia , 1979 .

[2]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Naming in aphasia: Interacting effects of form and function , 1978, Brain and Language.

[3]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[4]  H Goodglass,et al.  Sensory modality and object-naming in aphasia. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  S. Kohn The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia , 1984, Brain and Language.

[6]  H. Goodglass The syndromes of aphasia: similarities and differences in neurolinguistic features , 1981 .

[7]  S. Cappa,et al.  Phonemic and lexical errors in fluent aphasia: Correlation with lesion site , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[9]  D. Stuss,et al.  Naming to Picture Versus Description in Three Aphasic Subgroups , 1979, Cortex.

[10]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Lexical creativity during instances of word-finding difficulty: Broca's vs. Wernicke's aphasia , 1983, Brain and Language.

[11]  Contiguity versus similarity paraphasic substitutions in Broca's and in Wernicke's aphasia. , 1981, Journal of communication disorders.

[12]  M Barton,et al.  Variation of stimulus context and its effect on word-finding ability in aphasics. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[13]  H. Gardner The contribution of operativity to naming capacity in aphasic patients. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  H. Goodglass,et al.  The Effects of Cuing on Picture Naming in Aphasia , 1978, Cortex.

[15]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[16]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances , 1971 .

[17]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Assessment of Cognitive Deficit in the Brain-Injured Patient , 1979 .

[18]  N. Geschwind The Varieties of Naming Errors , 1967 .

[19]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The “Tip-of-the-Tongue” Phenomenon in Aphasia , 1976, Cortex.

[20]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[21]  Sarah E Williams,et al.  The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes , 1982, Brain and Language.

[22]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language , 1974 .