Cellular population dynamics control the robustness of the stem cell niche

ABSTRACT Within populations of cells, fate decisions are controlled by an indeterminate combination of cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic factors. In the case of stem cells, the stem cell niche is believed to maintain ‘stemness’ through communication and interactions between the stem cells and one or more other cell-types that contribute to the niche conditions. To investigate the robustness of cell fate decisions in the stem cell hierarchy and the role that the niche plays, we introduce simple mathematical models of stem and progenitor cells, their progeny and their interplay in the niche. These models capture the fundamental processes of proliferation and differentiation and allow us to consider alternative possibilities regarding how niche-mediated signalling feedback regulates the niche dynamics. Generalised stability analysis of these stem cell niche systems enables us to describe the stability properties of each model. We find that although the number of feasible states depends on the model, their probabilities of stability in general do not: stem cell–niche models are stable across a wide range of parameters. We demonstrate that niche-mediated feedback increases the number of stable steady states, and show how distinct cell states have distinct branching characteristics. The ecological feedback and interactions mediated by the stem cell niche thus lend (surprisingly) high levels of robustness to the stem and progenitor cell population dynamics. Furthermore, cell–cell interactions are sufficient for populations of stem cells and their progeny to achieve stability and maintain homeostasis. We show that the robustness of the niche – and hence of the stem cell pool in the niche – depends only weakly, if at all, on the complexity of the niche make-up: simple as well as complicated niche systems are capable of supporting robust and stable stem cell dynamics. Summary: Stem cell niche dynamics are very robust to external and physiological perturbations because proliferation and differentiation are naturally balanced and controlled by the reliance on a shared niche environment.

[1]  A. Spradling,et al.  Stem cells find their niche , 2001, Nature.

[2]  Douglas J Winton,et al.  Lineage selection and plasticity in the intestinal crypt , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  Heather A. Harrington,et al.  Parameter-free methods distinguish Wnt pathway models and guide design of experiments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[5]  S. Werner,et al.  Wound repair and regeneration , 1994, Nature.

[6]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[7]  S. Levin,et al.  Mathematical model of adult stem cell regeneration with cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic regulation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Lowengrub,et al.  Multispecies model of cell lineages and feedback control in solid tumors. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems , 2007, Science.

[10]  J. García-Ojalvo,et al.  Towards a statistical mechanics of cell fate decisions. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[12]  L. Allen Stem cells. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction , 2011, Nature.

[14]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[15]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Interacting Haematopoietic Stem Cell Niche Lineages , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Zang Ai-hua,et al.  Stem Cells,Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells , 2005 .

[18]  Paul Kirk,et al.  Conditional random matrix ensembles and the stability of dynamical systems , 2015, 1505.02920.

[19]  Sui Huang,et al.  Cell Lineage Determination in State Space: A Systems View Brings Flexibility to Dogmatic Canonical Rules , 2010, PLoS biology.

[20]  C. Bordenave,et al.  The circular law , 2012 .

[21]  R. Schofield The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. , 1978, Blood cells.

[22]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[23]  Ludovic Vallier,et al.  The Cell-Cycle State of Stem Cells Determines Cell Fate Propensity , 2014, Cell.

[24]  S. Pimm The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1984, Nature.

[25]  Gentian Buzi,et al.  Cell lineage branching as a strategy for proliferative control , 2015, BMC Biology.

[26]  David W. Rowe,et al.  Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche , 2009, Nature.

[27]  Tom Lenaerts,et al.  On the dynamics of neutral mutations in a mathematical model for a homogeneous stem cell population , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  H. Geiger,et al.  The ageing haematopoietic stem cell compartment , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[29]  Si Tang,et al.  Stability criteria for complex ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[30]  A. Martinez Arias,et al.  Cell dynamics and gene expression control in tissue homeostasis and development , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Stability of feasible predator-prey systems , 1975, Nature.

[32]  Sadri Hassani,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2000 .

[33]  G. Kokkoris,et al.  Complexity does not affect stability in feasible model communities. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Ascl2 acts as an R-spondin/Wnt-responsive switch to control stemness in intestinal crypts. , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[35]  C. Keller,et al.  Increased Wnt Signaling During Aging Alters Muscle Stem Cell Fate and Increases Fibrosis , 2007, Science.

[36]  C. Peterson,et al.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[37]  S. Frank Dynamics of Cancer: Incidence, Inheritance, and Evolution , 2007 .

[38]  P. Nowell The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. , 1976, Science.

[39]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Competitive clonal hematopoiesis in mouse chimeras explained by a stochastic model of stem cell organization. , 2005, Blood.

[40]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Topological sensitivity analysis for systems biology , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[42]  ALAN ROBERTS,et al.  The stability of a feasible random ecosystem , 1974, Nature.

[43]  Terence Tao,et al.  Random matrices: Universality of ESDs and the circular law , 2008, 0807.4898.

[44]  A. Trumpp,et al.  Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[45]  A. Uccelli,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[46]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells , 2015, Nature.

[47]  Adam L. Maclean,et al.  Population dynamics of normal and leukaemia stem cells in the haematopoietic stem cell niche show distinct regimes where leukaemia will be controlled , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[48]  M. Mangel,et al.  Stem cell biology is population biology: differentiation of hematopoietic multipotent progenitors to common lymphoid and myeloid progenitors , 2013, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[49]  Ute Dreher,et al.  Evolution In Changing Environments Some Theoretical Explorations , 2016 .