Effects of sonodynamic and photodynamic treatment on cellular thiol levels.

Exposure of murine leukemia L1210 cells to ultrasound in vitro resulted in cell fragmentation; cells which survived this treatment were 100% viable and showed a transient decrease in intracellular thiol pools (expressed as glutathione equivalents). Depletion of thiol pools became progressively greater with increasing exposure of cells to ultrasound; this was not associated with leakage of thiols into the medium. Biochemically elevating glutathione levels or sonication in the presence of the anti-oxidant trolox offered only a minor degree of protection against sonotoxicity. Photodynamic therapy also resulted in depletion of intracellular thiol levels, and loss of cell viability. In the presence of trolox, both effects were reversed, although elevation of intracellular thiol levels did not protect cell from phototoxicity.

[1]  Steven H. Selman,et al.  Tin (IV) Etiopurpurin Dichloride: An Alternative To DHE? , 1988, Other Conferences.

[2]  J Moan,et al.  PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY OF CANCER: EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[3]  D. Shrieve,et al.  Heterogeneity of cellular glutathione among cells derived from a murine fibrosarcoma or a human renal cell carcinoma detected by flow cytometric analysis. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  A. Girotti,et al.  Role of lipid peroxidation in hematoporphyrin derivative-sensitized photokilling of tumor cells: protective effects of glutathione peroxidase. , 1989, Cancer research.

[5]  T. Dougherty,et al.  HOW DOES PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WORK? , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[6]  S. Umemura,et al.  Sonodynamic approach to tumor treatment , 1992, IEEE 1992 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[7]  K. Suslick,et al.  The Temperature of Cavitation , 1991, Science.

[8]  D. H. Robinson,et al.  Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis prevented by Trolox. , 1994, Free radical biology & medicine.

[9]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Modes of photodynamic vs. sonodynamic cytotoxicity. , 1995, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[10]  David Kessel,et al.  Promotion of porphyrin cytotoxicity by ultrasound (Invited Paper) , 1992, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[11]  D. Kessel Photodynamic therapy and neoplastic disease. , 1992, Oncology research.

[12]  Koshiro Umemura,et al.  Hematoporphyrin as a Sensitizer of Cell‐damaging Effect of Ultrasound , 1989, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[13]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Porphyrin-induced enhancement of ultrasound cytotoxicity. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[14]  A. Meister Selective modification of glutathione metabolism. , 1983, Science.

[15]  Koshiro Umemura,et al.  Mechanism of Cell Damage by Ultrasound in Combination with Hematoporphyrin , 1990, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[16]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Enhancement of cell killing of HL-60 cells by ultrasound in the presence of the photosensitizing drug Photofrin II. , 1993, Cancer letters.

[17]  C. Cain,et al.  Sonochemical activation of hematoporphyrin: an ESR study. , 1994, Radiation research.

[18]  Jacob N. Israelachvili,et al.  New Mechanism of Cavitation Damage , 1991, Science.