Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points

SummaryInsidious errors in dipole modeling due to shell model misspecification in a spherical model were examined analyzing multiple time-points using the constraints of a commonly-used DSL (Dipole Source Localization) method. The computer simulation examined the differences in the fit dipole parameters for the same generator under two circumstances: 1) when computed as a single dipole active alone, and 2) when computed as a member of a simultaneously-active dipole pair. The computations were done using a simplification by which the dipole parameters computed from multiple time-points can be correctly assessed by computing dipole parameters at only two virtual time-points. Using multiple time-points in the DSL generally resulted in less error than if only a single time-point was used. However, how much improvement can be achieved by using multiple time-points, as compared with a single time-point, is a function of many factors, such as the location and orientation of the dipoles, and the relative magnitudes and overlap of the waveforms (i.e., time-varying magnitudes) of the dipoles, as well as the model used in the fitting. Further, it was shown that it is incorrect to assume that a multiple-time-point DSL will compute a zero magnitude for generators during quiescent intervals. Additionally, it was shown that a “correction” to reduce error for one pair of waveforms will not be applicable to other waveforms. Also, even if location errors are eliminated, magnitude and orientation errors can still be shown to be present. Finally, iterative reduction of the least-square error between the observed and predicted surface maps leads to increasing errors in dipole parameters. We conclude that a DSL with model misspecification can contain insidious (undetectable) errors.

[1]  D. Jewett,et al.  Far-field potentials generated by action potentials of isolated frog sciatic nerves in a spherical volume. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  M A B BRAZIER,et al.  The electrical fields at the surface of the head during sleep. , 1949, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[4]  D. Jewett,et al.  Far-field potentials recorded from action potentials and from a tripole in a hemicylindrical volume. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  G. H. Bishop Potential phenomena in thalamus and cortex. , 1949, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Sholl The organization of the cerebral cortex , 1957 .

[8]  J. P. Ary,et al.  Location of Sources of Evoked Scalp Potentials: Corrections for Skull and Scalp Thicknesses , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  G Fein,et al.  Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  M Scherg,et al.  Spatio-temporal modelling of early auditory evoked potentials. , 1984, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[11]  George Fein,et al.  Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300☆ , 1990 .

[12]  J. D. Munck The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials. , 1990 .

[13]  M. Scherg,et al.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  D L Jewett,et al.  Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  G. C. Quarton,et al.  The neurosciences : a study program , 1967 .

[16]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  D H Fender,et al.  The dimensionality of the human visual evoked scalp potential. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Riaz A Khan,et al.  SOURCE LOCALIZATION OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY VIA TIME-FREQUENCY LINEARLY CONSTRAINED MINIMUM VARIANCE METHOD , 2005 .

[19]  J. D. de Munck,et al.  The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.