The fate of Hancock II porcine valve recipients 25 years after implant.

OBJECTIVE The Hancock II (HII) is a second-generation porcine bioprosthesis introduced into clinical use in 1982. This study aimed to evaluate very long-term outcomes for the HII valve in a large patient population. METHODS Between May 1983 and November 1993, 517 consecutive patients (pts) (309 male, mean age: 64+/-9 years) underwent valve replacement (VR) surgery with HII, with 302 (58.4%) in the aortic VR (AVR) and 215 (41.6%) in the mitral VR (MVR) position, respectively. At implant, 106 pts (20.5%) were <60 years of age (G1), while 411 (79.5%) were > or =60 years of age (G2). The 25-year follow-up was complete for all pts at a median of 12 years (range: 0-25). RESULTS Long-term death occurred in 208 AVR and in 165 MVR pts. Survival at 15 and 20 years was 39.5% and 23.3% in AVR pts and 39.0% and 15.8% in MVR pts. At 25 years the survival of MVR pts was 13.7% (four pts at risk). Late freedom from re-operation was 85.5% and 79.3% at 15 and 20 years in the AVR pts and 73.3% and 52.8% in the MVR pts, respectively. In the AVR population, 20-year freedom from re-operation was 52.2% in G1 pts and 86.8% in G2 pts (p<0.0001), while in the MVR population it was 41.4% in G1 pts and 61.9% in G2 pts (p=0.201), respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm the excellent long-term performance of the HII bioprosthesis.

[1]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  Susan Armstrong,et al.  Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[4]  C. Schricker,et al.  Twenty-year experience with the St. Jude medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  G. Gerosa,et al.  Fifteen-year results with the Hancock II valve: a multicenter experience. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  P. Mykén,et al.  A 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Arun S. Mujumdar,et al.  Proceedings of the Second international symposium , 1980 .

[8]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[9]  J E Okies,et al.  Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1996, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  A. Mirza,et al.  Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic calcified stenosis: 18-year experience with 1133 patients. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  R. Suri Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Durability results up to 21 years , 2009 .