Posaconazole prophylaxis during front-line chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center, real-life experience

Background Posaconazole is effective as primary antifungal prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Design and Methods The impact of primary antifungal prophylaxis administered during front-line chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia was evaluated by comparing 58 patients who received oral amphotericin B (control group) to 99 patients who received oral posaconazole (posaconazole group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of proven/probable invasive fungal diseases. Secondary endpoints included incidence of invasive aspergillosis, survival at 4 and 12 months after the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia and costs. Results Proven/probable invasive fungal diseases were documented in 51.7% of patients in the control group and in 23.2% in the posaconazole group (P=0.0002). Invasive aspergillosis was documented in 43% of patients in the control group and in 15% in the posaconazole group (P=0.002). No survival difference was observed in patients aged over 60 years. In patients aged 60 years or less, a statistically significant survival advantage was observed at 4 months, but no longer at 12 months, in the posaconazole group (P=0.03). It was calculated that in the posaconazole group there was a mean 50% cost reduction for the antifungal drugs. Conclusions Primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole during front-line chemotherapy was effective in preventing invasive fungal diseases in a “real-life” scenario of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, resulted in an early but transitory survival advantage in younger patients and was economically advantageous.

[1]  V. Pawar,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole Or Itraconazole In The Prevention Of Invasive Fungal Infections Among Neutropenic Patients In The United States , 2013 .

[2]  K. Lyseng-Williamson Posaconazole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease in immunocompromised hosts. , 2011, PharmacoEconomics.

[3]  E. Holler,et al.  Clinical experience with posaconazole prophylaxis – a retrospective analysis in a haematological unit , 2011, Mycoses.

[4]  M. Hallek,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of posaconazole prophylaxis in patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML): a 6 year experience of the Cologne AML cohort. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[5]  D. Liew,et al.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole versus posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukaemia. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[6]  M. Vignetti,et al.  Randomized trial of two schedules of low‐dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin as induction monotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy. A phase II study of the EORTC and GIMEMA leukaemia groups (AML‐19) , 2010, British journal of haematology.

[7]  M. Sanz,et al.  Economic evaluation of posaconazole vs fluconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with GVHD following haematopoietic SCT , 2010, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[8]  J. Jansen,et al.  Economic evaluation of posaconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the Netherlands , 2010, Annals of Hematology.

[9]  Giuseppe Leone,et al.  Invasive aspergillosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SEIFEM-2008 registry study , 2010, Haematologica.

[10]  P. Chandrasekar,et al.  Safety of triazole antifungal drugs in patients with cancer. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  M. Vignetti,et al.  Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: the EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  FLT3 inhibition as a targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia , 2009, Current opinion in oncology.

[13]  D. Lebeaux,et al.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Posaconazole: a Monocentric Study with 54 Adults , 2009, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  C. Girmenia New generation azole antifungals in clinical investigation , 2009, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[15]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among neutropenic patients in the United States. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  M. Rinaldi,et al.  Posaconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: a Reference Laboratory Experience , 2009, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  H. Einsele,et al.  Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology , 2009, Haematologica.

[18]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Outcome and medical costs of patients with invasive aspergillosis and acute myelogenous leukemia-myelodysplastic syndrome treated with intensive chemotherapy: an observational study. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  D. Denning,et al.  Therapeutic drug monitoring for triazoles , 2008, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[20]  D. Kaul,et al.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with prolonged neutropenia. , 2008, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[21]  R. Foà,et al.  Clinically driven diagnostic antifungal approach in neutropenic patients: a prospective feasibility study. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  F. Meunier,et al.  The First European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia - ECIL1: a current perspective. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[23]  Patricia Muñoz,et al.  Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[24]  Raoul Herbrecht,et al.  Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[25]  L. Leibovici,et al.  Antifungal prophylaxis in cancer patients after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  F. Abbona,et al.  [A method to determine hospital costs associated with nosocomial infections]. , 2007, Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita.

[27]  L. Pagano,et al.  Invasive Aspergillosis in patients with acute leukemia: update on morbidity and mortality--SEIFEM-C Report. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[28]  B. D. de Pauw,et al.  Prophylaxis and aspergillosis--has the principle been proven? , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Perfect,et al.  Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  O. Cornely,et al.  HPLC analysis of the antifungal agent posaconazole in patients with haematological diseases , 2006, Mycoses.

[31]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Non-infusional vs intravenous consolidation chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-13 randomized phase III trial , 2006, Leukemia.

[32]  M. Vignetti,et al.  Use of glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF (lenograstim) during and/or after induction chemotherapy in patients 61 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of AML-13, a randomized phase-3 study. , 2005, Blood.

[33]  W. Leisenring,et al.  Antifungal therapy decreases sensitivity of the Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[34]  M. Sanz,et al.  Economic evaluation of posaconazole vs fluconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with GVHD following haematopoietic SCT , 2010, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[35]  B. Thiers Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole or Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Patients with Neutropenia , 2008 .

[36]  L. Pagano,et al.  Design and Methods , 2022 .

[37]  E. Estey,et al.  Causes of initial remission induction failure in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1996, Leukemia.