Dedicated registration for DCE MRI mammography

Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI mammography is currently receiving much interest in clinical research. It bears the potential to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions by analysis of the contrast uptake of the lesion. However, a registration of the individual images of a contrast-uptake series is crucial in order to avoid motion artefacts in the uptake curves, which could affect the diagnosis. It is on the other hand well known from the registration literature that a registration that uses a standard similarity measure (e.g. mean sum of squared differences, cross-correlation) may cause artefacts if contrast agent is taken up between the images to be registered. Thus we propose a registration on the basis of an application-specific similarity measure that explicitly uses features of the contrast uptake. We report initial results using this registration method.

[1]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Volume and Shape Preservation of Enhancing Lesions when Applying Non-rigid Registration to a Time Series of Contrast Enhancing MR Breast Images , 2000, MICCAI.

[2]  Maryellen Lissak Giger,et al.  Automated identification of temporal pattern with high initial enhancement in dynamic MR lesions using fuzzy c-means algorithm , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  A. Padhani,et al.  Perfusion MR Imaging of Extracranial Tumor Angiogenesis , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[4]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  A Horsman,et al.  Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  John A. Johnson,et al.  A model for capillary exchange 1 , 2003 .

[8]  Karen Davies,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Model-Driven Registration for Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Time Series , 2005, MICCAI.

[9]  Gillian Newstead,et al.  The effect of varying spectral resolution on the quality of high spectral and spatial resolution magnetic resonance images of the breast , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  L O Hall,et al.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition. , 1993, Medical physics.

[11]  Chander Mohan,et al.  A numerical study of some modified versions of controlled random search method for global optimization , 1988 .

[12]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  New model for analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  J S Rasey,et al.  Determination of the radiobiologically hypoxic fraction in multicellular spheroids from data on the uptake of [3H]fluoromisonidazole. , 1995, Radiation research.

[15]  Sven Kabus,et al.  Modular toolbox for derivative-based medical image registration , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. Graham,et al.  A modeling approach for quantifying tumor hypoxia with [F-18]fluoromisonidazole PET time-activity data. , 1995, Medical physics.