What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: traits, introduction history and filtering processes.

Whether the success of alien species can be explained by their functional or phylogenetic characteristics remains unresolved because of data limitations, scale issues and weak quantifications of success. Using permanent grasslands across France (50 000 vegetation plots, 2000 species, 130 aliens) and building on the Rabinowitz's classification to quantify spread, we showed that phylogenetic and functional similarities to natives were the most important correlates of invasion success compared to intrinsic functional characteristics and introduction history. Results contrasted between spatial scales and components of invasion success. Widespread and common aliens were similar to co-occurring natives at coarse scales (indicating environmental filtering), but dissimilar at finer scales (indicating local competition). In contrast, regionally widespread but locally rare aliens showed patterns of competitive exclusion already at coarse scale. Quantifying trait differences between aliens and natives and distinguishing the components of invasion success improved our ability to understand and potentially predict alien spread at multiple scales.

[1]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Vegetation ecology meets ecosystem science: Permanent grasslands as a functional biogeography case study. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and leaf functional traits, not introduced status, influence community assembly. , 2015, Ecology.

[3]  P. Choler Growth response of temperate mountain grasslands to inter-annual variations in snow cover duration. , 2015 .

[4]  M. Vilà,et al.  Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals in Europe using a standard scoring system , 2015 .

[5]  K. Beard,et al.  Introduction effort, climate matching and species traits as predictors of global establishment success in non‐native reptiles , 2015 .

[6]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Contrasting the effects of environment, dispersal and biotic interactions to explain the distribution of invasive plants in alpine communities , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[7]  T. Münkemüller,et al.  Identifying the signal of environmental filtering and competition in invasion patterns – a contest of approaches from community ecology , 2014 .

[8]  Winthrop R. Staples Book reviewInvasive Species: What Everyone Needs to Know, Daniel Simberloff. Oxford University Press (2013). xiv + 329 pp., $74.00, ISBN: 9780199922017 (hardback), $16.95, ISBN 9780199922031 (paperback) , 2014 .

[9]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[10]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Quantifying the invasiveness of species , 2014 .

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  C. Mecklin,et al.  Validity of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis relates to the stages of invasion. , 2013 .

[13]  M. Vilà 36 Responses on Invasive Species , 2013, Science.

[14]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The functional biogeography of species: biogeographical species roles of birds in Wallacea and the West Indies , 2013 .

[15]  H. Olff,et al.  Do alien plant species profit more from high resource supply than natives? A trait‐based analysis , 2013 .

[16]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Darwin's naturalization hypothesis: scale matters in coastal plant communities. , 2013, Ecography.

[17]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Building megaphylogenies for macroecology: taking up the challenge. , 2013, Ecography.

[18]  D. Coomes,et al.  Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[19]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Fifty years of change in Central European grassland vegetation: Large losses in species richness and animal-pollinated plants , 2012 .

[20]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[21]  D. Burslem,et al.  The comparative importance of species traits and introduction characteristics in tropical plant invasions , 2011 .

[22]  M. Fischer,et al.  The maximum relative growth rate of common UK plant species is positively associated with their global invasiveness , 2011 .

[23]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest , 2010 .

[24]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence , 2010 .

[25]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[26]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  F. A. La Sorte,et al.  Extra-regional residence time as a correlate of plant invasiveness: European archaeophytes in North America. , 2009, Ecology.

[28]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales , 2009 .

[29]  M. Arianoutsou,et al.  Alien Vascular Plants of Europe , 2009 .

[30]  Richard P Duncan,et al.  Darwin's naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[31]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[32]  F. Essl,et al.  Diversity of native and alien vascular plant species of dry grasslands in central Europe , 2008 .

[33]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[34]  P. Lambdon Is invasiveness a legacy of evolution? Phylogenetic patterns in the alien flora of Mediterranean islands , 2007 .

[35]  J. Molofsky,et al.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  D. Richardson,et al.  Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions , 2007 .

[37]  D. Richardson,et al.  Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility , 2006 .

[38]  D. Richardson,et al.  Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. , 2006, Ecology.

[39]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle , 2006 .

[40]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Life‐history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales , 2005 .

[41]  E. Etten Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using canoco , 2005 .

[42]  E. Weber,et al.  Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe , 2004 .

[43]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[44]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence , 2004 .

[45]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO , 2003 .

[46]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  What are invasive species , 2009 .

[47]  T. Garland,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods , 2002 .

[48]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[49]  F. S. Dobson,et al.  Seven forms of rarity in mammals , 2000 .

[50]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[51]  B. Harcourt,et al.  Fifty Years , 1955, International Review of Social History.

[52]  Charles C. Elton The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1958, Springer Netherlands.

[53]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.