Three-dimensional digital sonomicrometry: comparison with biplane radiography

Describes a three-dimensional (3D) digital sonomicrometry approach for locating and tracking 3D objects. A commercial digital sonomicrometry system was employed to measure scalar distances between omnidirectional sonomicrometers. 3D coordinates were then derived using the statistical technique of multidimensional scaling (MDS). 3D digital sonomicrometry was directly compared with biplane radiography of the ultrasound crystals for estimation of 3D distances in static phantoms and in vivo using an experimental canine preparation. An excellent correlation (r=0.992) was seen when comparing intercrystal distances derived from biplane radiography and sonomicrometry 3D coordinate data in the gelphantom. A Bland-Altman analysis shows that the average difference in coordinate determined distance between these two different methodologies was only 0.6310.46 mm, over a range of inter-crystal distances of 3.14 to 17.28 mm. In the in vivo canine preparation, the correlation between the sonomicrometry derived and biplane derived distances was also excellent (r=0.992) with a slope of 1.05 and an intercept of 0.06. The Bland-Altman analysis shows that the average difference in coordinate determined distance between these two different methodologies was only 0.78/spl plusmn/0.74 mm, over a range of inter-crystal distances of 2.90 to 27.66 mm. The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of accurately measuring scalar distances using 3D digital sonomicrometry. Digital sonomicrometry combines high spatial and temporal resolution with availability and portability to accurately measure distances in a closely packed array of implanted piezoelectric crystals.

[1]  N B Ingels,et al.  Measurement of Midwall Myocardial Dynamics in Intact Man by Radiography of Surgically Implanted Markers , 1975, Circulation.

[2]  S A MacKay,et al.  Graphics methods for tracking three-dimensional heart wall motion. , 1982, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[3]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[4]  L. Axel,et al.  MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. , 1989, Radiology.

[5]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Non-homogeneous analysis of three-dimensional transmural finite deformation in canine ventricular myocardium. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  A D McCulloch,et al.  Nonhomogeneous analysis of epicardial strain distributions during acute myocardial ischemia in the dog. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A D McCulloch,et al.  Three-dimensional transmural mechanical interaction between the coronary vasculature and passive myocardium in the dog. , 1994, Circulation research.

[8]  D. Bogen,et al.  Use of sonomicrometry and multidimensional scaling to determine the three-dimensional coordinates of multiple cardiac locations: feasibility and initial implementation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R C Gorman,et al.  Dynamic three-dimensional imaging of the mitral valve and left ventricle by rapid sonomicrometry array localization. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  S. A. Meyer,et al.  Application of sonomicrometry and multidimensional scaling to cardiac catheter tracking , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  P. Shi,et al.  Three-dimensional regional left ventricular deformation from digital sonomicrometry , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[12]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Point-tracked quantitative analysis of left ventricular surface motion from 3-D image sequences , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. Duncan,et al.  Point – Tracked Quantitative Analysis of Left Ventricular Motion from 3 D Image Sequences , 2000 .