On transport in porous formations characterized by heterogeneity of evolving scales

Solute transport in natural formations at the regional scale is influenced by several scales of heterogeneity which correspond to the presence of several geological units called facies. As customarily assumed in stochastic theories, inside the facies the transport can be characterized by a single scale of heterogeneity. At the regional scale several geological units are present such that a hierarchy of relevant scales needs to be defined. A possible model for this spatial variability assumes the log conductivity as a random space function of stationary increments characterized by a power law semivariogram. With this hypothesis the ergodic dispersion coefficient grows unbounded as time increases, leading to the phenomenon called anomalous dispersion. An alternative approach considers the plume in nonergodic conditions and assumes the effective dispersion coefficient, which is defined through differentiation in time of the expected value of the spatial second-order plume moment, as representative of macrodispersion. Large differences have been observed in the resulting plume spreading while approaching the problem using the above alternative definitions. In this paper we provide first-order analytical solutions for the longitudinal effective dispersion coefficient, D(L), as well as for the expected value of the longitudinal spatial plume moment, , that complement semianalytical expressions recently proposed in literature. Furthermore, we provide a semianalytical expression for the standard deviation of the longitudinal second-order moment which is important in assessing the interval of confidence of the estimation provided by . Suitable numerical simulations are performed to validate analytical and semianalytical expressions as well as to assess the impact of the cutoff in the log conductivity power spectrum imposed by choosing a finite domain dimension. We conclude that according to recently published results, the dispersion is anomalous when the Hurst coefficients, H, is larger than 0.5 while it is Fickian for H < 0.5. This is in contrast with the ergodic analysis which concludes that the dispersion is anomalous irrespective of the Hurst coefficient. Hence the effective dispersion coefficient is more effective than the ergodic dispersion coefficient to represent the plume spreading. However, the standard deviation of the longitudinal spatial second-order moment is of the same order of magnitude as the expected value leading to the conclusion that the estimations provided by D(L) and are affected by large uncertainties. Numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical solutions, and under some hypotheses they are not influenced by the cutoff. This is not the case for the ergodic second-order longitudinal moment, which strongly depends on the imposed cutoff.

[1]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Diffusion by Continuous Movements , 1922 .

[2]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[3]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[4]  J. Pickens,et al.  Scale‐dependent dispersion in a stratified granular aquifer , 1981 .

[5]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[7]  E. Sudicky A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[8]  William A. Jury,et al.  Fundamental Problems in the Stochastic Convection‐Dispersion Model of Solute Transport in Aquifers and Field Soils , 1986 .

[9]  G. Dagan,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 1. Constant head boundary , 1988 .

[10]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Prediction by the method of moments of transport in a heterogeneous formation , 1988 .

[11]  R. Ababou,et al.  Numerical simulation of three-dimensional saturated flow in randomly heterogeneous porous media , 1989 .

[12]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[13]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Impervious boundary , 1989 .

[14]  Time dependent anomalous diffusion for flow in multi-fractal porous media , 1990 .

[15]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion , 1990 .

[16]  S. P. Neuman Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media , 1990 .

[17]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  A Control Volume Finite Element Approach to NAPL Groundwater Contamination , 1991, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  Mary P. Anderson,et al.  Comment on “Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media” by S. P. Neuman , 1991 .

[19]  G. Dagan Dispersion of a passive solute in non-ergodic transport by steady velocity fields in heterogeneous formations , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Reply [to Comment on Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic , 1991 .

[21]  J. Glimm,et al.  A random field model for anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous porous media , 1991 .

[22]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic c , 1992 .

[23]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Simulation of dispersion in heterogeneous porous formations: Statistics, first‐order theories, convergence of computations , 1992 .

[24]  C. Welty,et al.  A Critical Review of Data on Field-Scale Dispersion in Aquifers , 1992 .

[25]  E. Eric Adams,et al.  Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 1. Overview and site description , 1992 .

[26]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  A multi-length-scale theory of the anomalous mixing-length growth for tracer flow in heterogeneous porous media , 1992 .

[27]  S. P. Neuman Comment on ``A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers'' by L. W. Gelhar, C. Welty, and K. R. Rehfeldt , 1993 .

[28]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Plume scale‐dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Eulerian analysis and three‐dimensional aquifers , 1993 .

[29]  J. Wen,et al.  Contaminant spreading in stratified soils with fractal permeability distribution , 1993 .

[30]  W. B. Lindquist,et al.  A theory of macrodispersion for the scale-up problem , 1993 .

[31]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  The significance of heterogeneity of evolving scales to transport in porous formations , 1994 .

[32]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of aquifer heterogeneity from the core scale to the basin scale: A case study , 1994 .

[33]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Generalized scaling of permeabilities: Validation and effect of support scale , 1994 .

[34]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Eulerian-Lagrangian approach for modeling of flow and transport in heterogeneous geological formations , 1994 .

[35]  Y. Rubin Flow and Transport in Bimodal Heterogeneous Formations , 1995 .

[36]  Harald Osnes,et al.  Stochastic analysis of head spatial variability in bounded rectangular heterogeneous aquifers , 1995 .

[37]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  On Advective Transport in Fractal Permeability and velocity Fields , 1995 .

[38]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Plume‐Scale Dependent Dispersion in Aquifers with a Wide Range of Scales of Heterogeneity , 1995 .

[39]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  Finite Peclet Extensions of Dagan's Solutions to Transport in Anisotropic Heterogeneous Formations , 1996 .

[40]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  HYDRO_GEN: A spatially distributed random field generator for correlated properties , 1996 .

[41]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .