Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task

We study inter-trial movement fluctuations exhibited by human participants during the repeated execution of a virtual shuffleboard task. Focusing on skilled performance, theoretical analysis of a previously-developed general model of inter-trial error correction is used to predict the temporal and geometric structure of variability near a goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The theory also predicts that the goal-level error scales linearly with intrinsic body-level noise via the total body-goal sensitivity, a new derived quantity that illustrates how task performance arises from the interaction of active error correction and passive sensitivity properties along the GEM. Linear models estimated from observed fluctuations, together with a novel application of bootstrapping to the estimation of dynamical and correlation properties of the inter-trial dynamics, are used to experimentally confirm all predictions, thus validating our model. In addition, we show that, unlike “static” variability analyses, our dynamical approach yields results that are independent of the coordinates used to measure task execution and, in so doing, provides a new set of task coordinates that are intrinsic to the error-regulation process itself.

[1]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[2]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Directionality in distribution and temporal structure of variability in skill acquisition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  F. Verhulst Nonlinear Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems , 1989 .

[7]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis. , 2013, Human movement science.

[9]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Haas,et al.  Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Adaptive Fractal Analysis of Stride Time Data in Parkinson's Disease: Stitching Together Short Gait Trials , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  J. Dingwell,et al.  The dynamical analysis of inter-trial fluctuations near goal equivalent manifolds. , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[12]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[13]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[14]  Robert J. van Beers,et al.  How Does Our Motor System Determine Its Learning Rate? , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[16]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos , 2003 .

[17]  P. Olver Nonlinear Systems , 2013 .

[18]  W. Bialek,et al.  A sensory source for motor variation , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement system variability , 2005 .

[20]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[21]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[22]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[23]  J. Timmer,et al.  Tempting long-memory - on the interpretation of DFA results , 2004 .

[24]  P. Terrier,et al.  Persistent and anti-persistent pattern in stride-to-stride variability of treadmill walking: influence of rhythmic auditory cueing. , 2012, Human movement science.

[25]  Jonathan B. Dingwell,et al.  Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking? , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  David S. Broomhead,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis of jerk congenital nystagmus , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  J. A. Stewart,et al.  Nonlinear Time Series Analysis , 2015 .

[28]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Persistence of Motor-Equivalent Postural Fluctuations during Bipedal Quiet Standing , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[30]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Trial-to-trial dynamics and learning in a generalized, redundant reaching task. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D. Sternad,et al.  Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  R. J. Beers,et al.  Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise , 2009, Neuron.

[33]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Richard E.A. van Emmerik,et al.  On the functional aspects of variability in postural control. , 2002 .

[36]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Neuromotor Noise, Error Tolerance and Velocity-Dependent Costs in Skilled Performance , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis reveals active control of both task-relevant and task-irrelevant variables , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[38]  Joseph P. Cusumano,et al.  Inter-Trial Dynamics of Repeated Skilled Movements , 2007 .

[39]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[41]  P. Terrier Step-to-Step Variability in Treadmill Walking: Influence of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Influence of motor learning on utilizing path redundancy , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  V. Roychowdhury,et al.  Assessment of long-range correlation in time series: how to avoid pitfalls. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Re-interpreting detrended fluctuation analyses of stride-to-stride variability in human walking. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[45]  K. Torre,et al.  Fractal dynamics of human gait: a reassessment of the 1996 data of Hausdorff et al. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[46]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[47]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Body-goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[49]  M. Latash,et al.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[54]  M. Latash,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Movement systems as dynamical systems : The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine , 2003 .

[56]  H. Stanley,et al.  Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. , 1995, Chaos.

[57]  Robert J. van Beers,et al.  How does our motor system determine its learning rate , 2012 .

[58]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Random walk of motor planning in task-irrelevant dimensions. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[60]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[61]  竹安 数博,et al.  Time series analysis and its applications , 2007 .

[62]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[63]  D. Domkin,et al.  Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  G. Schöner,et al.  Analyzing variance in multi-degree-of-freedom movements: uncovering structure versus extracting correlations. , 2007, Motor control.

[65]  M. Latash There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. , 2000, Motor control.

[66]  C. Peng,et al.  Long-range correlations in nucleotide sequences , 1992, Nature.

[67]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Movement Systems as Dynamical Systems , 2003, Sports medicine.

[68]  M. Latash,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Coordinate Dependence of Variability Analysis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[71]  R. van Emmerik,et al.  On the Functional Aspects of Variability in Postural Control , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.