On metonymy recognition for geographic IR

Metonymic location names refer to other, related entities and possess a meaning different from the literal, geographic sense. Metonymic names are to be treated differently to improve performance of geographic information retrieval (GIR). This paper presents a method for disambiguating location names in textual information to distinguish literal and metonymic senses, based on shallow features. The evaluation of this method is two-fold: First, we use a memory based learner to train a classifier and determine standard evaluation measures such as F-score and accuracy. Second, we perform retrieval experiments based on the GeoCLEF data (newspaper article corpus and queries) from 2005. We compare searching for location names in an index containing their literal and metonymic sense with searching in an index containing literal senses only. Evaluation results indicate that, using a large annotated corpus of location names, a classifier based on shallow features achieves adequate performance, and removing metonymic senses from a database index yields a higher performance for GIR.

[1]  Sven Hartrumpf,et al.  The semantically based computer lexicon HaGenLex. Structure and technological environment , 2003 .

[2]  Malvina Nissim,et al.  Towards a Corpus Annotated for Metonymies: the Case of Location Names , 2002, LREC.

[3]  Malvina Nissim,et al.  Learning to buy a Renault and talk to BMW: A supervised approach to conventional metonymy , 2005 .

[4]  Sven Hartrumpf,et al.  Using Semantic Networks for Geographic Information Retrieval , 2005, CLEF.

[5]  Sven Hartrumpf,et al.  Hybrid disambiguation in natural language analysis , 2003 .

[6]  Fredric C. Gey,et al.  GeoCLEF: the CLEF 2005 Cross-Language Geographic Information Retrieval Track , 2005, CLEF.

[7]  Masaki Murata,et al.  A Statistical Approach to the Processing of Metonymy , 2000, COLING.

[8]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Understanding metonymies in discourse , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[9]  David W. Aha,et al.  Instance-Based Learning Algorithms , 1991, Machine Learning.

[10]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Towards a semantic extraction of named entities , 2003 .

[11]  Yannick Versley,et al.  Extracting spatial information : grounding , classifying and linking spatial expressions [ Extended Abstract ] , 2022 .

[12]  Yves Peirsman,et al.  Example-Based Metonymy Recognition for Proper Nouns , 2006, EACL.

[13]  Sebastian Hammer,et al.  Zebra-User's Guide and Reference , 2005 .

[14]  Malvina Nissim,et al.  Metonymy Resolution as a Classification Task , 2002, EMNLP.

[15]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner , 2007 .

[16]  Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang,et al.  Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition , 2003, CoNLL.

[17]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .