Communicating cancer treatment information using the Web: utilizing the patient’s perspective in website development

BackgroundOnline cancer information can support patients in making treatment decisions. However, such information may not be adequately tailored to the patient’s perspective, particularly if healthcare professionals do not sufficiently engage patient groups when developing online information. We applied qualitative user testing during the development of a patient information website on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), a new guideline-recommended curative treatment for early-stage lung cancer.MethodsWe recruited 27 participants who included patients referred for SABR and their relatives. A qualitative user test of the website was performed in 18 subjects, followed by an additional evaluation by users after website redesign (N = 9). We primarily used the ‘thinking aloud’ approach and semi-structured interviewing. Qualitative data analysis was performed to assess the main findings reported by the participants.ResultsStudy participants preferred receiving different information that had been provided initially. Problems identified with the online information related to comprehending medical terminology, understanding the scientific evidence regarding SABR, and appreciating the side-effects associated with SABR. Following redesign of the website, participants reported fewer problems with understanding content, and some additional recommendations for better online information were identified.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that input from patients and their relatives allows for a more comprehensive and usable website for providing treatment information. Such a website can facilitate improved patient participation in treatment decision-making for cancer.

[1]  N. Arora,et al.  Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[2]  R. T. Evans Usability testing and research , 2002 .

[3]  E. Boyko,et al.  Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. , 2004, Family medicine.

[4]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of five treatment strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly. , 2012 .

[5]  P. Ubel,et al.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  S. Senan,et al.  Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Early-Stage Lung Cancer , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[7]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  S. Senan,et al.  Stereotactic radiation therapy: changing treatment paradigms for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2011, Current opinion in oncology.

[9]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003 .

[10]  L. G. Doak,et al.  The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  C. Powell,et al.  Patients rate physician communication about lung cancer , 2011, Cancer.

[12]  N. Keating,et al.  Evidence-Based Risk Communication A Systematic Review , 2014 .

[13]  T. Davis,et al.  The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. , 1990, The Journal of family practice.

[14]  E. S. St John,et al.  Patients' understanding of medical terminology used in the breast clinic. , 2013, Breast.

[15]  R. Puri,et al.  Clinic , 1907, The American journal of dental science.

[16]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making. , 2012, Health affairs.

[17]  Lisa Gibbs,et al.  Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis , 2007, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[18]  William B. Lober,et al.  Barriers to the use of a Personal Health Record by an Elderly Population , 2006, AMIA.

[19]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Older cancer patients' information and communication needs: what they want is what they get? , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  B. Zikmund‐Fisher,et al.  The Effect of Format on Parents' Understanding of the Risks and Benefits of Clinical Research: A Comparison Between Text, Tables, and Graphics , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[21]  R. Deber,et al.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[23]  Aurelia Macabasco-O'Connell,et al.  Knowledge and Perceptions of Health Literacy Among Nursing Professionals , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[24]  Gregory Makoul,et al.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  G. Davison,et al.  Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Matthew I. Trotter,et al.  Patients' use of the Internet for health related matters: a study of Internet usage in 2000 and 2006 , 2008, Health Informatics J..

[29]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Alla Keselman,et al.  A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[31]  Maaike van den Haak,et al.  Evaluating consumer health information websites: The importance of collecting observational, user-driven data , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference.

[32]  M. Sandelowski Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. , 2001, Research in nursing & health.

[33]  L. Degner,et al.  The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[34]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Siamak Noorbaloochi,et al.  Validation of Screening Questions for Limited Health Literacy in a Large VA Outpatient Population , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[36]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Use of the Internet by Women with Breast Cancer , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[37]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[38]  Karen A. Gresty,et al.  Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: a review of the literature , 2006, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[40]  Michael K. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  The prevalence of limited health literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[41]  N. Keating,et al.  Evidence-Based Risk Communication , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  Nadine Bol,et al.  Do videos improve website satisfaction and recall of online cancer-related information in older lung cancer patients? , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[43]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  P. A. Kelly,et al.  Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[45]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Paul K. J. Han,et al.  Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[48]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[49]  Rajani S Sadasivam,et al.  Development of an Interactive, Web-Delivered System to Increase Provider–Patient Engagement in Smoking Cessation , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  R. Ferguson Health literacy , 2013, Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives.

[51]  E. Seydel,et al.  Evaluation of Internet-Based Technology for Supporting Self-Care: Problems Encountered by Patients and Caregivers When Using Self-Care Applications , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[52]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics , 2022 .

[53]  D. de Ruysscher,et al.  Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[54]  Joseph A. Diaz,et al.  Patients’ use of the internet for medical information , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[55]  Christina M. Sabee,et al.  The Association of Patients’ Primary Interaction Goals with Attributions for their Doctors’ Responses in Conversations about Online Health Research , 2012 .

[56]  Markus Bühner,et al.  How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making – the doctors’ view , 2012, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[57]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Thoracic Cancer Comparative Effectiveness of 5 Treatment Strategies for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly , 2012 .