Cultural universality and specificity of student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries.

BACKGROUND A comprehensive understanding of the contextual factors that are linked to student engagement requires research that includes cross-cultural perspectives. AIMS This study investigated how student engagement in school is associated with grade, gender, and contextual factors across 12 countries. It also investigated whether these associations vary across countries with different levels of individualism and socio-economic development. SAMPLES The participants were 3,420 7th, 8th, and 9th grade students from Austria, Canada, China, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Malta, Portugal, Romania, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. METHODS The participants completed a questionnaire to report their engagement in school, the instructional practices they experienced, and the support they received from teachers, peers, and parents. Hierarchical linear modelling was used to examine the effects at both student and country levels. RESULTS The results across countries revealed a decline in student engagement from Grade 7 to Grade 9, with girls reporting higher engagement than boys. These trends did not vary across the 12 countries according to the Human Development Index and Hofstede's Individualism Index. Most of the contextual factors (instructional practices, teacher support, and parent support) were positively associated with student engagement. With the exception that parent support had a stronger association with student engagement in countries with higher collectivism, most of the associations between the contextual factors and student engagement did not vary across countries. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate both cultural universality and specificity regarding contextual factors associated with student engagement in school. They illustrate the advantages of integrating etic and emic approaches in cross-cultural investigations.

[1]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[2]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. , 1977 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  J. Finn.  Withdrawing From School , 1989 .

[5]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[6]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[7]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[8]  R. Berger,et al.  Social Support Networks of Gay Men , 1993, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[9]  Kristin E. Voelkl,et al.  Disruptive and Inattentive-Withdrawn Behavior and Achievement among Fourth Graders , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  J. Finn,et al.  Academic success among students at risk for school failure. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  K. Wentzel.  Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .

[12]  Shawn Van Etten,et al.  Aboriginal, Anglo, and immigrant Australian students' motivational beliefs about personal academic success: are there cultural differences? , 1998 .

[13]  G. Bowen,et al.  Social Support Networks and School Outcomes: The Centrality of the Teacher , 2000 .

[14]  Peter Freebody,et al.  Boys, literacy and schooling: expanding the repertoires of practice , 2002 .

[15]  E. Skinner,et al.  Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children's Academic Engagement and Performance. , 2003 .

[16]  S. Jimerson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms , 2003 .

[17]  R. Prinz,et al.  School Bonding in Children and Adolescents: Conceptualization, Assessment, and Associated Variables , 2003, Clinical child and family psychology review.

[18]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[19]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Multiple Dimensions of Family Involvement and Their Relations to Behavioral and Learning Competencies for Urban, Low-Income Children , 2004 .

[20]  Helen Cowie,et al.  Ayuda entre Iguales en las escuelas: desarrollo y retos , 2006 .

[21]  Laura D'Andrea Tyson,et al.  The global gender gap report , 2006 .

[22]  R. Hausmann,et al.  The global gender gap report 2007 , 2007 .

[23]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement , 2006 .

[24]  Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow,et al.  Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries ☆ , 2007 .

[25]  Julia L. Mendez,et al.  Parent characteristics, economic stress, and neighborhood context as predictors of parent involvement in preschool children’s education , 2007 .

[26]  M. Chiu.  Families, economies, cultures, and science achievement in 41 countries: country-, school-, and student-level analyses. , 2007, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[27]  D. McInerney.  Personal investment, culture and learning: insights into school achievement across Anglo, Aboriginal, Asian and Lebanese students in Australia. , 2008, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[28]  Beyond conscientiousness: a personality perspective on the widening sex difference in school performance , 2008 .

[29]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries , 2008 .

[30]  A. Crouter,et al.  The Development and Correlates of Academic Interests from Childhood through Adolescence. , 2009, Journal of educational psychology.

[31]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[32]  P. Deku,et al.  Building new identities in teacher preparation for inclusive education in Ghana , 2011 .

[33]  Jim Parsons,et al.  Improving Student Engagement , 2011 .

[34]  M. Chiu,et al.  Classroom Discipline Across Forty-One Countries: School, Economic, and Cultural Differences , 2011 .

[35]  Aryn M. Dotterer,et al.  Classroom Context, School Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Early Adolescence , 2011, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[36]  N. Zhou,et al.  The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. , 2012 .

[37]  경북대학교,et al.  The Structural Relationship Among Classroom Goal Structures, Basic Psychological Needs, and Academic Engagement of Elementary and Middle School Students , 2012 .

[38]  C. Hatzichristou,et al.  Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. , 2012, Journal of school psychology.

[39]  J. Berry.  Achieving a global psychology. , 2013 .

[40]  M. Reichert,et al.  I Can Learn from You: Boys as Relational Learners , 2014 .

[41]  Yi Liu,et al.  Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: the results of an international study from 12 countries. , 2014, School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[42]  Ronnel B. King,et al.  Culture's Consequences on Student Motivation: Capturing Cross-Cultural Universality and Variability Through Personal Investment Theory , 2014 .

[43]  Yin-kum Law.  Motivating Instructional Contexts Inventory--Adapted Version , 2015 .