A condensed performance-validation strategy for multiplex detection kits used in studies of human clinical samples.

Quantification of soluble phase analytes represents one of the most commonly used techniques applied to a broad range of samples in both basic and clinical immunology laboratories, as well as in context of drug development and diagnostic programs. The recent increase in the application of multiplex immunoassays, such as Luminex, has resulted in a growing array of commercially available multiplex kits. Validated, highly sensitive, and precise methods for such quantification is critical, especially when applied to precious sample collections. While vendors are expected to carry out kit performance validation, discrepancies between technical specifications provided with multiplex kits and their actual performance can be relatively common. Here we present a validation strategy that will aid users to select the optimal kits for their purpose and most validly interpret results from the multiplex assays. To illustrate key considerations when validating and comparing kits, we assess the performance of three conventional multiplex cytokine kits. Our findings confirm the importance of validating the performance of commercial multiplex kits and provide a practical and cost-effective approach that can be readily implemented in both academic and translational laboratory settings.

[1]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Bead-Based Multiplex Analysis/Bead-basierte Multiplexanalyse , 2003 .

[2]  Caterina Guinovart,et al.  Comparison of commercial kits to measure cytokine responses to Plasmodium falciparum by multiplex microsphere suspension array technology , 2011, Malaria Journal.

[3]  J. P. McCoy,et al.  Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: Comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers , 2004, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[4]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Development, validation, and implementation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of five cytokines in human serum. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[5]  Gregor Rothe,et al.  Bead‐Based Multiplex Analysis , 2003 .

[6]  R. Kircheis,et al.  Comparison of the Calibration Standards of Three Commercially Available Multiplex Kits for Human Cytokine Measurement to WHO Standards Reveals Striking Differences , 2008, Biomarker insights.

[7]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[8]  H. Soares,et al.  Method Validation and Measurement of Biomarkers in Nonclinical and Clinical Samples in Drug Development: A Conference Report , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  P. Luciw,et al.  A comparison of multiplex suspension array large‐panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients , 2009, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[10]  W. de Jager,et al.  Solid-phase and bead-based cytokine immunoassay: a comparison. , 2006, Methods.

[11]  J. W. Pickering,et al.  Comparison of a Multiplex Flow Cytometric Assay with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Quantitation of Antibodies to Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Haemophilus influenzae Type b , 2002, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[12]  U. Prabhakar,et al.  Validation and comparative analysis of a multiplexed assay for the simultaneous quantitative measurement of Th1/Th2 cytokines in human serum and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture supernatants. , 2004, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  V. Marks,et al.  False-positive immunoassay results: a multicenter survey of erroneous immunoassay results from assays of 74 analytes in 10 donors from 66 laboratories in seven countries. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  P. Wadhwa,et al.  Validation and comparison of luminex multiplex cytokine analysis kits with ELISA: determinations of a panel of nine cytokines in clinical sample culture supernatants. , 2005, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[15]  Jean W Lee,et al.  Method validation and application of protein biomarkers: basic similarities and differences from biotherapeutics. , 2009, Bioanalysis.