Contextuality as a resource for measurement-based quantum computation beyond qubits

Contextuality - the inability to assign pre-existing outcomes to all potential measurements of a quantum system - has been proposed as a resource that powers quantum computing. The measurement-based model provides a concrete manifestation of contextuality as a computational resource, as follows. If local measurements on a multi-qubit state can be used to evaluate non-linear boolean functions with only linear control processing, then this computation constitutes a proof of contextuality - the possible local measurement outcomes cannot all be pre-assigned. However, this connection is restricted to the special case when the local measured systems are qubits, which have unusual properties from the perspective of contextuality. A single qubit cannot allow for a proof of contextuality, unlike higher-dimensional systems, and multiple qubits can allow for state-independent contextuality with only Pauli observables, again unlike higher-dimensional generalisations. Here we identify precisely which non-local features of contextuality are necessary in a qudit measurement-based computation that evaluates high-degree polynomial functions with only linear control. We introduce the concept of local universality, which places a bound on the space of output functions accessible under the constraint of single-qudit measurements. Thus, the partition of a physical system into subsystems plays a crucial role for the increase in computational power. A prominent feature of our setting is that the enabling resources for qubit and qudit measurement-based computations are of the same underlying nature, avoiding the pathologies associated with qubit contextuality.

[1]  Dan E. Browne,et al.  Generalized Bell-inequality experiments and computation , 2011 .

[2]  Rui Soares Barbosa,et al.  Contextual Fraction as a Measure of Contextuality. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[4]  Joel J. Wallman,et al.  Estimating Outcome Probabilities of Quantum Circuits Using Quasiprobabilities. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[5]  Mermin Nd Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. , 1990 .

[6]  Lorenzo Catani,et al.  State-injection schemes of quantum computation in Spekkens' toy theory , 2017, Physical Review A.

[7]  R. Raussendorf,et al.  Wigner Function Negativity and Contextuality in Quantum Computation on Rebits , 2014, 1409.5170.

[8]  Rui Soares Barbosa,et al.  A complete characterization of all-versus-nothing arguments for stabilizer states , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  R. Raussendorf,et al.  S , 2017, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[10]  H. Briegel,et al.  Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states , 2003, quant-ph/0301052.

[11]  D. Browne,et al.  Computational power of correlations. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[12]  J. Niel de Beaudrap,et al.  A linearized stabilizer formalism for systems of finite dimension , 2011, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[13]  Robert Raussendorf,et al.  Cohomological framework for contextual quantum computations , 2016, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[14]  J. Emerson,et al.  Corrigendum: Negative quasi-probability as a resource for quantum computation , 2012, 1201.1256.

[15]  N. Mermin Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell , 1993, 1802.10119.

[16]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality , 2011, 1102.0264.

[17]  Asher Peres,et al.  Two simple proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem , 1991 .

[18]  Joseph Emerson,et al.  Contextuality and the Single-Qubit Stabilizer Subtheory. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[19]  Mermin,et al.  Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[20]  Giovanni Carù Towards a complete cohomology invariant for non-locality and contextuality , 2018, 1807.04203.

[21]  Robert Raussendorf,et al.  The cohomological and the resource-theoretic perspective on quantum contextuality: common ground through the contextual fraction , 2018, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[22]  Dan E Browne,et al.  Contextuality as a Resource for Models of Quantum Computation with Qubits. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[23]  C. P. Sun,et al.  Quantum computation based on d-level cluster state (11 pages) , 2003, quant-ph/0304054.

[24]  R. Raussendorf Quantum computation, discreteness, and contextuality , 2009 .

[25]  Elham Kashefi,et al.  Quantum Advantage from Sequential-Transformation Contextuality. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  The Cohomology of Non-Locality and Contextuality , 2011, QPL.

[27]  Nicolas Delfosse,et al.  Contextuality and Wigner-function negativity in qubit quantum computation , 2015, 1511.08506.

[28]  Stephen D. Bartlett,et al.  Contextuality bounds the efficiency of classical simulation of quantum processes , 2018, 1802.07744.

[29]  Victor Veitch,et al.  Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation , 2014, Nature.

[30]  Nadish de Silva Logical paradoxes in quantum computation , 2017, LICS.

[31]  D. Gross Hudson's theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems , 2006, quant-ph/0602001.

[32]  Victor Veitch,et al.  The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation , 2013, 1307.7171.

[33]  E. Galvão Discrete Wigner functions and quantum computational speedup , 2004, quant-ph/0405070.