Motor familiarity: Brain activation when watching kinematic displays of one's own movements

The perception of action is influenced by the observer's familiarity with its movement. However, how does motor familiarity with own movement patterns modulate the visual perception of action effects? Cortical activation was examined with fMRI while 20 observers were watching videotaped point-light displays of markers on the shoulders, the right elbow, and wrist of an opposing table tennis player. The racket and ball were not displayed. Participants were asked to predict the invisible effect of the stroke, that is, the ball flight direction. Different table tennis models were used without the observers knowing and being informed in advance that some of the presented videos displayed their own movements from earlier training sessions. Prediction had to be made irrespective of the identity of the player represented by the four moving markers. Results showed that participants performed better when observing their "own" strokes. Using a region-of-interest approach, fMRI data showed that observing own videos was accompanied by stronger activation (compared to other videos) in the left angular gyrus of the inferior parietal lobe and the anterior rostral medial frontal cortex. Other videos elicited stronger activation than own videos in the left intraparietal sulcus and right supramarginal gyrus. We suggest that during action observation of motorically familiar movements, the compatibility between the observed action and the observers' motor representation is already coded in the parietal angular gyrus--in addition to the paracingulate gyrus. The activation in angular gyrus is presumably part of an action-specific effect retrieval that accompanies actor-specific prefrontal processing. The intraparietal sulcus seems to be sensitive to incongruence between observed kinematics and internal model representations, and this also influences processing in the supramarginal gyrus.

[1]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  N. Troje,et al.  The influence of motor expertise and motor experience on action and actor recognition , 2011 .

[3]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[5]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Vaitl,et al.  Utilizing the ventriloquism-effect to investigate audio-visual binding , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Recognizing one’s own clapping: The role of temporal cues , 2004, Psychological research.

[9]  Karen Zentgraf,et al.  Simulation during observation of human actions – Theories, empirical studies, applications , 2011, Vision Research.

[10]  Rudolf Stark,et al.  The embodied nature of motor imagery: the influence of posture and perspective , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  In search of the emotional self: an fMRI study using positive and negative emotional words. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[12]  B. Repp,et al.  Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  The function of the left angular gyrus in mental arithmetic: Evidence from the associative confusion effect , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[14]  E. Schröger,et al.  Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40‐Hz response to self‐initiated sounds , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  C. Frith,et al.  Self-awareness and action , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Decety,et al.  What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective‐taking , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Angela Sirigu,et al.  Body and movement: Consciousness in the parietal lobes , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  A. Williams,et al.  Recognizing and predicting movement effects: identifying critical movement features. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[23]  F. D. de Lange,et al.  Motor planning is facilitated by adopting an action's goal posture: an fMRI study. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[25]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[26]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Actions: Interactions of Perception and Action , 2001, Psychological science.

[27]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  H. Nittono,et al.  Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Uta Frith,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Processes in Social Cognition , 2008, Neuron.

[30]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Dissociation between Ventral and Dorsal fMRI Activation during Object and Action Recognition , 2005, Neuron.

[31]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Perceiving Action Identity , 2004, Psychological science.

[32]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Agency, simulation and self-identification , 2004 .

[33]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[34]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Do We Really Need Vision? How Blind People “See” the Actions of Others , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[37]  R. Hari,et al.  Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  R. Miall,et al.  Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. , 2003, Neuroreport.

[39]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[40]  F. Waszak,et al.  Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain , 2007, Brain Research.

[41]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[42]  Jessica A. Sommerville,et al.  Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Rudolf Stark,et al.  The role of own-body representations in action observation: a functional MRI study , 2009 .

[45]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  W Prinz,et al.  Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Selective responses in right inferior frontal and supramarginal gyri differentiate between observed movements of oneself vs. another , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Visual and action cues contribute to the self–other distinction , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[52]  B. Balas,et al.  Personal Familiarity Influences the Processing of Upright and Inverted Faces in Infants , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Jean Decety,et al.  Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency , 2002, Neuroreport.

[55]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  Prediction, Cognition and the Brain , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..