From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: concept, practice and future directions

More than 1 year ago, the subject area on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment has been launched (Zamagni 2012) in order to provide a virtual place in which scientists from different disciplinary fields could discuss the main challenges in addressing sustainability with a life cycle perspective. The challenge has been taken on also by the editors of three subject areas that deal with sustainability from complementary angles—Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA). The result was the launch of a call for papers for a special issue on LCSA, whose results we are glad to present. Our initiative took its point of departure from two facts: (1) sustainability has become quite a keyword in any decisioncontext situation and the scientific community has the duty to provide its contribution in demonstrating what might be sustainable and how to measure it with a scientific approach; (2) the life cycle approach is considered to provide a valuable support in integrating sustainability into the design, innovation, and evaluation of products and services, as can be seen in several environmental policies at the European and international level in which life cycle thinking represents the backbone. As far as the timely and challenging aspects of sustainability are concerned, the EU has mainstreamed sustainable development into a broad range of its policies, such as the initiatives against climate change and the promotion of a low-carbon economy. The European Council (2009) confirmed that sustainable development remains a fundamental objective of the European Union under the Lisbon Treaty. Moreover, as emphasized in the Presidency’s report on the review of the Union’s Sustainable Development Strategy, the strategy will continue to provide a long-term vision and constitute the overarching policy framework for all Union policies and strategies (Council of the European Union 2009). Sustainability is a concept that needs to be addressed not only at the policy level but also in the business context: many companies have included sustainability in their mission, also driven by an increasing demand for sustainable products by more aware consumers. Although the policy and the business context deal with sustainability in different ways, given the diversity of needs, a common element for both is the complexity entailed by the assessment. Such a complexity is due to the followingmain aspects, as pointed out byHeijungs et al. (2010)

[1]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2) , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Till M. Bachmann,et al.  Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Susanna Horn,et al.  Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[6]  York Ostermeyer,et al.  Multidimensional Pareto optimization as an approach for site-specific building refurbishment solutions applicable for life cycle sustainability assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Life cycle optimization of energy-intensive processes using eco-costs , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[9]  Mingming Hu,et al.  An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? , 2010 .

[13]  John D. Sterman,et al.  All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist† , 2002 .

[14]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Integrating environmental and economic life cycle analysis in product development: a material selection case study , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[16]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Life Cycle Optimization , 1999 .

[21]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[22]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.