Optimal replacement of mastitic cows determined by a hierarchic Markov process.

Farmers frequently have to decide whether to keep or to replace cows that suffer from clinical mastitis. A dynamic programming model was developed to optimize these decisions for individual cows within the herd, using the hierarchic Markov process technique. This technique provides a method to model a wide variety of cows, differing in age, productive performance, reproductive status, and clinical mastitis occurrence. The model presented was able to support decisions related to 63% of all replacements. Results--for Dutch conditions--showed the considerable impact of mastitis on expected income of affected cows. Nevertheless, in most cases, the optimal decision was to keep and to treat rather than to replace the cow. Clinical mastitis occurring in the previous lactation negligibly influence expected income. Clinical mastitis in current lactation, especially in the current month, however, had a significant effect on expected income. Total losses caused by clinical mastitis were US$83/yr per cow. Farm level treatment, which reduced incidence by 25%, on a farm with 10 clinical quarter cases per 10,000 cow days, may cost at maximum US$27/yr per cow.

[1]  J. Renkema,et al.  Economic evaluation of replacement rates in dairy herds I. Reduction of replacement rates through improved health , 1979 .

[2]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen.  Optimal Replacement and Ranking of Dairy Cows under Milk Quotas , 1989 .

[3]  Aalt A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle. III. Influence of variation in reproduction and production , 1985 .

[4]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  An application of stochastic dynamic programming to support sow replacement decisions. , 1993 .

[5]  A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy cattle: a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970 , 1991 .

[6]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  Hierarchic Markov processes and their applications in replacement models , 1988 .

[7]  R. Bellman.  Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[8]  G. R. Bryan,et al.  Optimizing model: insemination, replacement, seasonal production, and cash flow. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen.  Optimal replacement and ranking of dairy cows determined by a hierarchic Markov process , 1987 .

[10]  Albert N. Halter,et al.  A multi-stage stochastic replacement decision model : application to replacement of dairy cows , 1963 .

[11]  J. A. Arendonk,et al.  Management Guides for Insemination and Replacement Decisions , 1988 .

[12]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen.  Maximization of Net Revenue per Unit of Physical Output in Markov Decision Processes , 1991 .

[13]  A A Dijkhuizen,et al.  Short- and long-term production losses and repeatability of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  A Survey of Markov Decision Programming Techniques Applied to the Animal Replacement Problem , 1994 .

[15]  Aalt A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Dynamic probabilistic simulation of dairy herd management practices. I. Model description and outcome of different seasonal calving patterns , 1993 .

[16]  W. R. Congleton,et al.  Profitability of Dairy Cow Herd Life , 1984 .

[17]  A. Groen.  Derivation of economic values in cattle breeding: a model at farm level. , 1988 .

[18]  J. A. Arendonk.  A model to estimate the performance, revenues and costs of dairy cows under different production and price situations , 1985 .

[19]  R. Bellman,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes , 1960 .

[20]  J. A. Arendonk,et al.  Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle IV. Influence of seasonal variation in performance and prices. , 1986 .