Reducing the risks of new product development

New products suffer from notoriously high failure rates. Many new products fail, not because of technical shortcomings, but because they simply have no market. Not surprisingly, then, studies have found that timely and reliable knowledge about customer preferences and requirements is the single most important area of information necessary for product development. To obtain such data, many organizations have made heavy ? but often unsuccessful ? investments in traditional market research. The authors provide an alternative. Companies including Threadless, Yamaha and Ryohin Keikaku have begun to integrate customers into the innovation process by soliciting new product concepts directly from them. These firms also ask for commitments from customers to purchase a new product before the companies commence final development and manufacturing. This process ? called ?collective customer commitment?? can help companies avoid costly product failures. In essence, collective customer commitment enables firms to serve a market segment efficiently without first having to identify that segment, and it helps convert expenditures in market research directly into sales.

[1]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Overcoming Mass Confusion: Collaborative Customer Co-Design in Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation? A common framework for modeling and analysis , 2004 .

[3]  A. Harrison,et al.  Implications of form postponement to manufacturing: a case study , 2004 .

[4]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  The Power of Innomediation , 2003 .

[5]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4327-03 June 2003 Welfare implications of user innovation , 2003 .

[6]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  The Support Economy: Why Corporations Are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism , 2002 .

[7]  Karin Tollin,et al.  Customization as a business strategy--a barrier to customer integration in product development? , 2002 .

[8]  T. V. Kumaresh,et al.  The false promise of mass customization , 2001 .

[9]  Marjorie E. Adams,et al.  Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[10]  Ian Barclay,et al.  New Product Development From Past Research to Future Applications , 1998 .

[11]  S. Ogawa Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry , 1998 .

[12]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[13]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Reducing the Cost of Demand Uncertainty Through Accurate Response to Early Sales , 1996, Oper. Res..

[14]  Raymond R. Burke Virtual Shopping: Breakthrough in Marketing Research , 1996 .

[15]  William H. Redmond,et al.  An ecological perspective on new product failure: The effects of competitive overcrowding , 1995 .

[16]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot Study , 1994 .

[17]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[18]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications , 1994 .

[19]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New product models: Practice, shortcomings and desired improvements , 1992 .

[20]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .