DO SMALL-SEEDED SPECIES HAVE HIGHER SURVIVAL THROUGH SEED PREDATION THAN LARGE-SEEDED SPECIES?

Seed ecologists have often stated that they expect larger-seeded species to have lower survivorship through postdispersal seed predation than smaller-seeded species. Similar predictions can be made for the relationship between survivorship through predis- persal seed predation and seed mass. In order to test these predictions, we gathered data regarding survivorship through 24 hours of exposure to postdispersal seed predators for 81 Australian species, and survivorship through predispersal seed predation for 170 Aus- tralian species. These species came from an arid environment, a subalpine environment, and a temperate coastal environment. We also gathered data from the published literature (global) on survivorship through postdispersal seed predation for 280 species and survi- vorship through predispersal seed predation for 174 species. We found a weak positive correlation between seed mass and the percentage of seeds remaining after 24 hours of exposure to postdispersal seed predators at two of three field sites in Australia, and no significant relationship across 280 species from the global lit- erature, or at the remaining field site. There was no significant relationship between seed mass and survivorship through predispersal seed predation either cross-species or across phylogenetic divergences in any of the vegetation types, or in the compilation of data from the literature. Postdispersal seed removal was responsible for a greater percentage of seed loss in our field studies than was predispersal seed predation. On average, 83% of diaspores remained after 24 hours of exposure to postdispersal seed removers, whereas 87% of seeds survived all predispersal seed predation that occurred between seed formation and seed maturity. Mean seed survival was higher in the field studies than in the literature compi- lations, and species showing 100% survival were heavily underrepresented in the literature. These differences may be due to biases in species selection or publication bias. Seed defensive tissue mass increased isometrically with seed mass, but there was no significant relationship between the amount of defensive tissue per gram of seed reserve mass and survivorship through postdispersal seed predation.

[1]  S. Moegenburg.  Sabal palmetto seed size: causes of variation, choices of predators, and consequences for seedlings , 1996, Oecologia.

[2]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert , 1993, Oecologia.

[3]  N. Greig.  Predispersal seed predation on five Piper species in tropical rainforest , 1993, Oecologia.

[4]  R. Hobbs.  Harvester ant foraging and plant species distribution in annual grassland , 1985, Oecologia.

[5]  K. Gross,et al.  Experimental studies of seed predation in old-fields , 1984, Oecologia.

[6]  Z. Abramsky.  Experiments on seed predation by rodents and ants in the Israeli desert , 1983, Oecologia.

[7]  M. Westoby,et al.  Latitude, seed predation and seed mass , 2003 .

[8]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Seed dispersal and frugivory : ecology, evolution, and conservation , 2002 .

[9]  P. Hulme,et al.  Seed-eaters: seed dispersal, destruction and demography. , 2002 .

[10]  T. Hobbs,et al.  Growing Valley Oak , 2001, Ecological Restoration.

[11]  Katariina Kiviniemi.  Evolution of recruitment features in plants: a comparative study of species in the Rosaceae , 2001 .

[12]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species , 2001 .

[13]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2005 .

[14]  C. Gasser,et al.  Recent progress in reconstructing angiosperm phylogeny. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[15]  Mwangi Gathua.  The Effects of Primates and Squirrels on Seed Survival of a Canopy Tree, Afzelia quanzensis, in Arabuko‐Sokoke Forest, Kenya 1 , 2000 .

[16]  O. Eriksson,et al.  A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants , 2000 .

[17]  M. Crawley,et al.  Seed predators and plant population dynamics. , 2000 .

[18]  M. Westoby,et al.  The Evolutionary ecology of seed size , 2000 .

[19]  A. Moles,et al.  Post-dispersal seed predation on eleven large-seeded species from the New Zealand flora: a preliminary study in secondary forest. , 1999 .

[20]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: a sowing experiment , 1999 .

[21]  P. Hulme.  Post-dispersal seed predation and seed bank persistence , 1998, Seed Science Research.

[22]  Rainforest plants protect their investments. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity , 1998 .

[24]  D. Peart,et al.  Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds : a comparative study of 40 tree species in a Southeast Asian rainforest , 1998 .

[25]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  Nitrogen-richness and protection of seeds in Australian tropical rainforest: a test of plant defence theory , 1998 .

[26]  D. Coomes,et al.  Consistencies in post‐dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy‐fruited species among seasons, years and sites , 1998 .

[27]  L. Rodgerson.  MECHANICAL DEFENSE IN SEEDS ADAPTED FOR ANT DISPERSAL , 1998 .

[28]  R. Manson,et al.  Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields , 1998 .

[29]  P. Hulme.  Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution , 1998 .

[30]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  Canopy type , forest floor , predation , and competition influence conifer seedling emergence and early survival in two Minnesota conifer – deciduous forests , 1998 .

[31]  Elizabeth A. Kellogg,et al.  An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants , 1998 .

[32]  K. Klinka,et al.  Seedfall, seed germination, and initial survival and growth of seedlings of Thuja plicata in southwestern British Columbia , 1998 .

[33]  K. Holl,et al.  Effects of Species, Habitat, and Distance from Edge on Post‐dispersal Seed Predation in a Tropical Rainforest 1 , 1997 .

[34]  Potential effects of granivores on old field succession , 1997 .

[35]  C. Hau.  Tree seed predation on degraded hillsides in Hong Kong , 1997 .

[36]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[37]  K. Harms,et al.  Seed damage tolerance and seedling resprouting ability of Prioria copaifera in Panamá , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[38]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  Post-dispersal seed predation and the establishment of vertebrate dispersed plants in Mediterranean scrublands , 1997, Oecologia.

[39]  N. Asquith,et al.  DOES MAMMAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION CONTROL RECRUITMENT IN NEOTROPICAL FORESTS? EVIDENCE FROM PANAMA , 1997 .

[40]  Selective predation on the seeds of woody plants , 1997 .

[41]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal , 1996 .

[42]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Partial predispersal seed predation in Lotus corniculatus L. (Fabaceae) , 1996, Seed Science Research.

[43]  P. Mucunguzi.  Bruchids and survival of Acacia seeds , 1995 .

[44]  C. Benkman.  THE IMPACT OF TREE SQUIRRELS (TAMIASCIURUS) ON LIMBER PINE SEED DISPERSAL ADAPTATIONS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  E. Redente,et al.  Effects of Selective Seed Predation by Rodents on Shortgrass Establishment , 1995 .

[46]  O. O. Osunkoya,et al.  Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Queensland , 1994 .

[47]  O. O. Osunkoya.  Postdispersal survivorship of north Queensland rainforest seeds and fruits: effects of forest, habitat and species , 1994 .

[48]  K. Thompson,et al.  Seeds in soil and worm casts from a neutral grassland , 1994 .

[49]  E. Simms,et al.  Tannins and Partial Consumption of Acorns: Implications for Dispersal of Oaks by Seed Predators , 1993 .

[50]  R. Reader.  Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species , 1993 .

[51]  B. Simon.  A key to Australian grasses. Second edition. , 1993 .

[52]  T. Philippi,et al.  Granivory and competition as determinants of annual plant diversity in the Chihuahuan desert , 1992 .

[53]  M. Westoby,et al.  Fate of Seeds Adapted for Dispersal by Ants in Australian Sclerophyll Vegetation , 1992 .

[54]  M. Fenner.  Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[55]  James H. Brown,et al.  Control of a Desert-Grassland Transition by a Keystone Rodent Guild , 1990, Science.

[56]  B. Simon.  A key to Australian grasses. , 1990 .

[57]  A. Grafen.  The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[58]  S. Louda.  CHAPTER 3 – Predation in the Dynamics of Seed Regeneration , 1989 .

[59]  T. J. Smith.  SEED PREDATION IN RELATION TO TREE DOMINANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN MANGROVE FORESTS , 1987 .

[60]  I. Abbott,et al.  Comparison of insects and vertebrates as removers of seed and fruit in a Western Australian forest , 1985 .

[61]  F. Putz,et al.  Impact of mammals on early recruitment of a tropical canopy tree, Dipteryx panamensis, in Panama , 1984 .

[62]  J. Keeley,et al.  Seed predation due to the yucca moth symbiosis , 1984 .

[63]  T. Auld.  Seed predation in native legumes of south‐eastern Australia , 1983 .

[64]  James H. Brown,et al.  EFFECTS OF PREDATION AND COMPETITION ON SURVIVORSHIP, FECUNDITY, AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF DESERT ANNUALS' , 1980 .

[65]  Foraging characteristics of a desert ant assemblage: functional morphology and species separation , 1980 .

[66]  James H. Brown,et al.  Granivory in Desert Ecosystems , 1979 .

[67]  D. Davidson,et al.  Species Diversity and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants , 1977 .

[68]  James H. Brown,et al.  Competition Between Seed-Eating Rodents and Ants in Desert Ecosystems , 1977, Science.

[69]  J. Nelson,et al.  Factors Affecting Seed Reserves in the Soil of a Mojave Desert Ecosystem, Rock Valley, Nye County, Nevada , 1977 .

[70]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[71]  P. Feeny,et al.  Plant apparency and chemical defense , 1976 .

[72]  John L. Harper,et al.  The Shapes and Sizes of Seeds , 1970 .

[73]  D. Janzen.  SEED‐EATERS VERSUS SEED SIZE, NUMBER, TOXICITY AND DISPERSAL , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[74]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[75]  E. Pitman.  A NOTE ON NORMAL CORRELATION , 1939 .