The Relative Contributions of Facial Shape and Surface Information to Perceptions of Attractiveness and Dominance

Although many studies have investigated the facial characteristics that influence perceptions of others’ attractiveness and dominance, the majority of these studies have focused on either the effects of shape information or surface information alone. Consequently, the relative contributions of facial shape and surface characteristics to attractiveness and dominance perceptions are unclear. To address this issue, we investigated the relationships between ratings of original versions of faces and ratings of versions in which either surface information had been standardized (i.e., shape-only versions) or shape information had been standardized (i.e., surface-only versions). For attractiveness and dominance judgments of both male and female faces, ratings of shape-only and surface-only versions independently predicted ratings of the original versions of faces. The correlations between ratings of original and shape-only versions and between ratings of original and surface-only versions differed only in two instances. For male attractiveness, ratings of original versions were more strongly related to ratings of surface-only than shape-only versions, suggesting that surface information is particularly important for men’s facial attractiveness. The opposite was true for female physical dominance, suggesting that shape information is particularly important for women’s facial physical dominance. In summary, our results indicate that both facial shape and surface information contribute to judgments of others’ attractiveness and dominance, suggesting that it may be important to consider both sources of information in research on these topics.

[1]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance , 2010 .

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces , 2009, International Journal of Primatology.

[3]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Individual Differences in Women's Perceptions of other Women's Dominance , 2012 .

[5]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[6]  Peter A. Rhodes,et al.  A study of digital camera colorimetric characterisation based on polynomial modelling , 2001 .

[7]  G. J. Lewis,et al.  Perceiving Aggression from Facial Structure: Further Evidence for A Positive Association with Facial Width–To–Height Ratio and Masculinity, but Not for Moderation by Self–Reported Dominance , 2014 .

[8]  Robert Brooks,et al.  The role of facial hair in women's perceptions of men's attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities , 2013 .

[9]  A.J O'Toole,et al.  3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of "averages" in attractiveness and age , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  D. Perrett,et al.  Redness Enhances Perceived Aggression, Dominance and Attractiveness in Men's Faces , 2012, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[11]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch , 2006 .

[12]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[13]  Stella J. Faerber,et al.  African Perceptions of Female Attractiveness , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  P. Hancock,et al.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: No special role for surface reflectance processing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  B. Dixson,et al.  Beards augment perceptions of men's age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness , 2012 .

[18]  A. Little,et al.  Sensation seeking and men's face preferences , 2007 .

[19]  Nick Neave,et al.  The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dominance in male faces , 2008 .

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  Face Structure Predicts Cooperation , 2012, Psychological science.

[21]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of "quality" in women and men. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[23]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[24]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[26]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: an application of three-dimensional morphing , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Little,et al.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Richard Russell,et al.  Sex, Beauty, and the Relative Luminance of Facial Features , 2003, Perception.

[29]  D. Perrett,et al.  Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust , 2010, Psychological science.

[30]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Richard Russell,et al.  A Sex Difference in Facial Contrast and its Exaggeration by Cosmetics , 2009, Perception.

[32]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[33]  V Bruce,et al.  Perceiving the sex and race of faces: the role of shape and colour , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  G. Rhodes.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  A. Little,et al.  Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men's faces , 2012 .

[37]  David A. Puts,et al.  Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans , 2010 .