Towards a more accessible e-government in Jordan: an evaluation study of visually impaired users and Web developers

Accessibility of e-government services is a key issue for people with disabilities. E-government services can significantly save lot of their effort and provide them with lot of easy to reach services. Yet, accessibility of e-government websites is still under-explored topic in Jordan. In order to understand the accessibility of e-government websites and its problems, this study evaluates a set of e-government websites using 20 blind and visually impaired volunteers and at the same time conducts a survey on e-government websites developers. The results from e-government websites accessibility evaluation are compared with expert's review. For both the evaluation and the survey we used a set of accessibility guidelines developed by W3C [i.e. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0)], Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, and other literature review. In order to evaluate a reasonable number of e-government Web sites, a set of common e-government websites visited by the blind community were identified and a set of specific common tasks to test were defined. The analysis of the research results revealed a serious weakness in understanding, adopting and implementing Web accessibility guidelines throughout nearly all Jordanian e-government websites. Improving awareness, training developers and users, and developing formal guidelines of Web accessibility are needed to enable visually impaired and blind users in accessing e-government Web sites and their services. Further research analysis discusses and identifies key areas in which e-government accessibility can be enhanced.

[1]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Evaluating Government Website Accessibility: a Comparative Study , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[2]  Tanya Goette,et al.  An exploratory study of the accessibility of state government Web sites , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[3]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley.  The Accessibility of Municipal Government Websites , 2006 .

[4]  Oei Us Epa.  What is Section 508 , 2013 .

[5]  Pallab Paul,et al.  A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  Criteria For Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Yeliz Yesilada,et al.  How much does expertise matter?: a barrier walkthrough study with experts and non-experts , 2009, Assets '09.

[8]  Maeve Paris,et al.  Website accessibility: a survey of local e-government websites and legislation in Northern Ireland , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[9]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources , 2004, TCHI.

[10]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  E-Government Web Site Accessibility in Australia and China , 2006 .

[11]  A. Dawn Shaikh,et al.  Thinking but not seeing: think-aloud for non-sighted users , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[13]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[14]  Ahmed Al-Omari,et al.  E-Government Readiness Assessment Model , 2006 .

[15]  Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes,et al.  The perception of accessibility in Web development by academy, industry and government: a survey of the Brazilian scenario , 2008, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[16]  Jenny Craven,et al.  A task-based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites , 2007 .

[17]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Investigating the problems faced by older adults and people with disabilities in online environments , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Jonathan W. Palmer.  Designing for Web Site Usability , 2002, Computer.

[20]  Hussein Al-Omari,et al.  E-Government Architecture In Jordan: A Comparative Analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Luís Carriço,et al.  Designing Universally Accessible Mobile Multimodal Artefacts , 2008, ICEIS.

[22]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Heuristic Walkthroughs: Finding the Problems Without the Noise , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Jenny Craven.  Access to electronic resources by visually impaired people , 2003, Inf. Res..

[24]  Abdelbaset Rabaiah,et al.  A Strategic Framework of e-Government: Generic and Best Practice , 2009 .

[25]  Arno R. Lodder,et al.  Law firms and IT - Towards optimal knowledge management , 2005 .

[26]  Joanne Kuzma,et al.  Regulatory Compliance and Web Accessibility of UK Parliament Sites , 2009, J. Inf. Law Technol..

[27]  Tamara Almarabeh,et al.  E-government in Jordan , 2009 .

[28]  Xiaomin Zhu,et al.  Web usability: A user-centered design approach , 2007 .

[29]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: implementation of the partial concurrent thinking aloud technique , 2010, Cognitive Processing.

[30]  Helen Petrie,et al.  The Evaluation of Accessibility, Usability, and User Experience , 2009, The Universal Access Handbook.

[31]  Robert Johnson,et al.  Designing universal access: web-applications for the elderly and disabled , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[32]  Klaus Oestreicher,et al.  Global e-government Web Accessibility: An Empirical Examination of EU, Asia and African Sites , 2009, ICTA.

[33]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[34]  Xiaomin Zhu,et al.  Web usability: A user-centered design approach , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Assessing Section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  I. Alsmadi,et al.  The Requirements for Building an E-commerce Infrastructure , 2009 .

[37]  Bohn Stafleu van Loghum,et al.  Online … , 2002, LOG IN.